this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
132 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nothing is permanent. What’s made can be unmade. And at the foundation of Donald Trump’s campaign is a promise to unmake our democratic Constitution.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He wants to be a Nazi dictator. This is not hidden.

[–] CitizenKong 3 points 1 week ago

He couldn't be more mask-off if he was sieg-heiling across the stage with a funny mustache.

Anyone who doesn't see him for what he is is willfully ignorant at this point.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bit late with that one, eh NYT?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not the first article in this vein, but it needs to be said a lot right now.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's a lot of cheeky "hurr, thanks for finally catching up!" in response to all these recent articles about Trump being an ignorant, bigoted dictator wannabe, and while none of them are wrong, it's just not useful commentary. All this self-servinf political-intellectual one-upsmanship only serves to talk down to people who are finally coming around to the reality of the situation, and I'd much rather be glad it's finally being said than jerk myself off over the fact that I've known it for the past 8 years.

I get that it's frustrating to have mainstream media only finally admitting to Trump's anti-democratic position as early ballots are beginning to make things look like he's losing this race, but it's just not constructive conversation. Spread the word, get more people exposed to this, rather than lording it over others that it's old news.

[–] kautau 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Theres plenty of boomers who scroll Facebook and see all their politics from their conservative friends/families/ad networks/russian social bots and been fed that rhetoric, but also will get a newspaper delivered like the NYT. Here’s hoping whatever impact it can make, it will make

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Eight years late. Better than never I suppose.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 2 weeks ago

The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New York Times:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/01/opinion/donald-trump-kamala-harris-election-power.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Wk4.Oeez.F7Ths8G89f30&smid=url-share
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support