this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
555 points (99.1% liked)

Gaming

3245 readers
110 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Waluigi is a sex offender in my head cannon. He gives me Charlie’s uncle from it’s always sunny vibes

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

I admit, the Ron 'Fat Sex Offender' Jeremy mustache is not a good luck.

[–] ekZepp 21 points 1 month ago

This feels way too plausible.

[–] ZeffSyde 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Waluigi Snap! Like Pokemon Snap! , but more of a stealth game where Waluigi creeps around taking candid photos of other characters. Bonuses I'd they successfully steal small trophies from the characters and sneak back to the white Waluigi Van undetected.

[–] lowleveldata 13 points 1 month ago

Because we didn't get the cockfighting game they promised

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You mean the cardboard character that's the counterpart to another cardboard character and that only exists because Wario needed a doubles partner in Mario Tennis? Even his name is an afterthought, why would Nintendo suddenly start caring enough to give him a game?

[–] NOT_RICK 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair I don’t think any of the Mario characters have much in terms of character development

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Waaaaaaaahhh-Luigi!

[–] CodexArcanum 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

https://theemptypage.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/critical-perspectives-on-waluigi/

I, We, Waluigi: a Post-Modern analysis of Waluigi by Franck Ribery

Waluigi is the ultimate example of the individual shaped by the signifier. Waluigi is a man seen only in mirror images; lost in a hall of mirrors he is a reflection of a reflection of a reflection. You start with Mario – the wholesome all Italian plumbing superman, you reflect him to create Luigi – the same thing but slightly less. You invert Mario to create Wario – Mario turned septic and libertarian – then you reflect the inversion in the reflection: you create a being who can only exist in reference to others. Waluigi is the true nowhere man, without the other characters he reflects, inverts and parodies he has no reason to exist. Waluigi’s identity only comes from what and who he isn’t – without a wider frame of reference he is nothing. He is not his own man. In a world where our identities are shaped by our warped relationships to brands and commerce we are all Waluigi.

There is apparently a sequel post now as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I remembered about that post while writing my comment but couldn't find it. I didn't know the sequel but both explain the problem of Waluigi as a character, Nintendo sees him as filler and he's more useful for them as such. If they start fleshing him out he'll be less useful in other contexts... Which is also a apt metaphor for why conservative societies want people to fit faceless molds

[–] CodexArcanum 2 points 1 month ago

I figured you might have read it, as your comment had evoked it for me.

I really like the reading of Waluigi as a kind of perfect symbol for our post-modern times. I don't think the article goes quite far enough. Mario is already a simulacra: a stereotype that doesn't really exist, certainly not anymore and never really did. So Waluigi is the reflection of an inverse of a simulation without a base reality.

It's very relatable, as you say, an apt metaphor for how our cultures treat the common person. Maybe the right Waluigi game isn't one that fleshes him out and brings him closer to the audience. Maybe something like Krusty's Fun House or Lemmings: burning through legions of Waluigis (1up mushroom clones? robots? one person somehow split into a multitude?) to accomplish trivial goals for Wario, the stand-in for the corporate overlords?

[–] cafuneandchill 1 points 1 month ago

Waluigi is a Jean-Paul Sartre character -- defined not but what he is, but by the circumstances and how others view him

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The names make a little more sense in Japanese as a pun; warui means bad, and Luigi is spelled Ruigi in katakana. So Waruigi is bad Luigi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Ironically, using Ruigi for Waluigi in English (as Ruin+Luigi) would sound less lazy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Because Waluigi is valid.

[–] ApollosArrow 2 points 1 month ago

His name is what bothers me the most. It could have been as simple as Juigi. It sounds stupid, but not as stupid as Waluigi.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

He'd need to be an asshole like watio, wario only ever does stuff for money.

I don't think we ever got anything concrete for waluigi tho, even in that tennis game.

Let him cause havock and mischief in a distant kingdom until Mario or Luigi are called for help as final bosses.

[–] synapse1278 4 points 1 month ago
[–] samus12345 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

👁️👁️
(------)