this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
92 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19132 readers
6742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 800XL 1 points 1 day ago

Conversely, 56 percent of men backed former President Donald Trump, while 37 percent of women did.

Sounds like Michigan men are insecure, clueless and weak.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In Quinnipiac polls conducted in five of the seven key swing states throughout October, Harris had a significant lead among women, while Trump saw a comparable advantage among men in those same places.

This is likely due to the whole "Alpha male" toxic mentality people like Andrew Tate keep peddling. They've managed to condition a lot of men that women should not perform any role other than being an obedient housewife.

According to recent polls, Democrats seem to be losing support among groups they’ve counted on in the past, like Black men and Latino men.

This one is the most concerning. This could really swing a few key counties and even entire states. Hopefully Democrats can address this in time to rectify it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

not copying trump's playbook on immigration would help A LOT with the latinos.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

yes they do and sometimes it feels like i'm related to all of them; but the one thing that matters is that most of them are older and there are more that are younger. harris must appeal to the younger ones and her copy & paste of trump's plan does not work for them.

[–] Tylerdurdon 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It makes me sad that we're still this dumb.

[–] Blum0108 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The women are trying to drag us forward

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Imagine being a young woman knowing that your male counterparts are voting to take away your rights. Although I guess that really isn't a new thing.

My dark horse hope is that women show up to the election with baseball bats and vote with rates that are comparable to places with compulsory voting.

[–] dingdongmetacarples 2 points 2 days ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 3 days ago

Vox - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Vox:

Wiki: reliable - Vox is considered generally reliable. Some editors say that Vox does not always delineate reporting and opinion content or that it is a partisan source in the field of politics. See also: Polygon, The Verge, New York


MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.vox.com/politics/380132/gender-gap-election-harris-trump
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support