this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
313 points (93.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35582 readers
1403 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm pro abortion and against the death penalty! Someone ask me! I promise I'm not a troll. I am honestly pro abortion not just pro choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, I think that's a reasonably common position on the left. Not particularly unusual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pro-choice yes. Haven't heard many actually pro-abortion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does that mean to you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

See my other comment. Coles notes is until we solve the problem with unwanted children being born I will be pro-abortion.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because they don't care about "life".

They care about punishing people.

[–] bamfic 7 points 1 day ago

An unwanted unplanned baby is punishment for having sex outside of marriage.

Death penalty is punishment for being convicted of murder.

It's perfectly consistent when you look at it all about punishment.

The cruelty is indeed the point

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because people receiving the death penalty theoretically did something wrong, and fetuses did not. I'm neither against abortion nor pro death penalty, and I don't really see a contradiction there.

[–] OccamsRazer 7 points 1 day ago

That wasn't so hard, was it? People tripping over themselves to find a gotcha and forgetting to use a little common sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nosavingthrow 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

IS it a contradiction? I don't agree with the death penalty or anti-abortion position, but I don't see some essential link between either position. You can hold two different beliefs about two different things is how come.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mhague 2 points 1 day ago

If you smoke weed you're more likely to wear converse. It's aesthetics. When someone says they're anti abortion I usually see it as aesthetics. They want others to see them as being anti abortion. That's what they get out of it.

It isn't a literal belief. Democrats reduce abortions, much better than cons. Being anti abortion should mean voting for Democrats... IF you were still taking things literally. It's not misinformation or lack of education, it's misaligned priorities.

They're just trying to be a tribe and signal allegiance. To have literal beliefs that you live by regardless of "your side" is a completely different game to what they're playing.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kind of seems like a contradiction

They don't care. There's no point in calling conservatives out on hypocrisy. Only a very small number of them will give a shit, and those will be the ones who were already having doubts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Precisely this. From a philosophical-logical POV, it doesn't make sense. From the POV of establishing and maintaining power/ dominance/ oppression/ hegemony, however, it's the only thing that makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

They’re both cruel to anyone “below” them (this is a simplistic argument.) They’re easy to cry wolf about in order to draw people over to your side, people who vote and act emotionally

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They would argue that the "baby" is innocent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Because with reactionaries, the cruelty is the point.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not all the same people: Roman Catholics, for example, tend to oppose both.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UncleGrandPa 1 points 1 day ago

The common thread is harm and punishment. They wish harm to those they would punish for the transgressions they make up in their heads

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's no logical contradiction between believing that some people should be killed and believing that other people shouldn't be killed. You might as well ask why a soldier would shoot at his enemies but not his allies

(I'm not picking a side in the "Are fetuses people?" debate here. They are from the point of view of the people against abortion.)

[–] Pacattack57 1 points 1 day ago

Because the inmates deserve it. The babies don’t.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I obviously don't agree with them, but my assumption is that it has to do with maturity/innocence. An unborn child hasn't done anything wrong. They're full of opportunity and have a whole life ahead of them. A criminal sentenced for death has I some way done something very wrong. They've had their chance and failed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I'm trying to be the devil's advocate here: one could say that one is an innocent "life" while the other is not.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

contradiction

You’ve discovered conservative politics. Party of freedom that wants to restrict women’s access to healthcare, books in schools, reproductive rights, healthcare for children, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›