this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
355 points (97.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35440 readers
1221 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is to train the AI claw machine that will place us into our movie seats in the future.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, into our airplane seats! See, if we're all in claw machine seats, they don't need aisles so we can get crammed in even closer together. No more wasting time with overhead bins: when you're in the terminal, you put your carry-on in the bin under your seat, close the lid, and sit down. Then the claw machine scans your ticket, picks you and your seat up and deposits you in the right slot - no more wasting the airline's time holding up the line while someone tries to steal your seat or misreads a row number or fumbles with the overhead bins.

Once you land, they empty the plane by running a full-row claw machine, and then the entire plane is an empty shell, making it easy to clean. The empty seats themselves can be cleaned in the terminals between flights - hell, they can probably set up some kind of conveyor belt autoclean system.

I wonder how much it would cost to bribe the FAA and NTSB to sign off on this concept? .....

[–] Duder167 3 points 1 year ago

This made me giggle

[–] Confused_Emus 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I really hate the ones that make you select pictures that contain particular images. Apparently if you do them too fast, they'll just keep telling you to try again.

[–] gerbler 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also the anti-fingerprinting in Firefox breaks them. Fucking awesome that I can solve that bullshit just fine and it still won't validate unless I let some asshole slurp my browser data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I dislike that this is the case :(

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

The goal is to be worse than the computer now???

[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that why I have to go through 3 of those fucking things per captcha every time?

[–] NewNewAccount 8 points 1 year ago

Being too accurate can also impact you. Try clicking and then unclicking a borderline one.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hate the ones that make you select pictures that contain particular images.

In a way, those are interesting because you can use them (sometimes retrospectively) to tell what Google or Google's clients are working on. First it was all the text stuff as they digitized old newspapers and books and magazines. Then there was that period when you wanted you to identify stop signs and house numbers and businesses and other stuff like that - all of that fed into Google Maps. Then it was traffic lights and speed limits and stop signs, which was early self-driving. Now it's motorcycles, buses, bridges, and bicycles - all things that were (maybe still are?) proving a challenge for advanced self-driving. The traffic lights and crosswalks fit into this somehow, though I'm not sure if it's self-driving cars, map directions, both, or something else entirely.

I have absolutely no idea what they're doing with fire hydrants, staircases and mountains, though. It'll probably be obvious in retrospect. But anyway, how do you like your life as not only a data point that Google can sell to anyone interested, but also as a cog feeding data into Google's many businesses and helping them solve their identification issues?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s illegal to park in front of fire hydrants so you’d want a self-driving car to know that. However, I think Tesla is pretty much the only company using cameras for self-driving cars (rather than lidar/radar), so not sure this is the real reason for the captchas. Knowing where hydrants are would be useful for Google Maps too.

[–] Mirshe 3 points 1 year ago

Staircases can help identify if a location is handicap-accessible.

[–] Selmafudd 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck is that what it is? Sometime I just give up after they seem to reset 3-4 times

[–] Confused_Emus 2 points 1 year ago

Next time you get one, try giving it a second between clicking each picture. It'll probably validate after the first or second one.

[–] Selmafudd 23 points 1 year ago

I'm so upset at myself for not getting a screenshot but I was in a hurry to complete one and no shit it was a few images you had to confirm if it had a bus in the picture and one of them was a photo of a snow covered bus stop which looked liked Russia with 2 guys having a fucking axe fight, blood splatter in the snow and all...

[–] Rooty 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So now we have Wario-ware style microgames as captchas? Beats "which piece of this image is a bus?".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And then if you actually click on all of the squares, even the ones with slivers of a bus in it, it'll make you do it 4 more times, because fuck you.

[–] BURN 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just decide to no longer use whatever it is when there’s that many dumb captchas. Half the time it doesn’t matter what you do and it’ll make you do them again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Please verify that you are human to file taxes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Using the arrows please help the drone take out the insurgent base.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I feel like all these new captchas (especially the die sum one) will soon be easier for bots than for real humans.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I like to purposely get captchas only 90 percent right in hopes we can push it further and further then maybe kill them off one day

[–] dylanTheDeveloper 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great now Pornhub will have mandatory minigames you have to beat in order to watch videos

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Beat a game to beat your meat

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's gonna be frustrating as hell when captchas have to be solved by answering a complex philosophical question only a human could adequately convey.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I feel like chart GPT would probably handle that better than most of us anyway

[–] JustANOTHERuser 1 points 1 year ago

ChatGBT will do this...Can already do this pretty well. As can more than a few others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some of the ones on Darknet are 10x worse. Everything from chess, to a card match game, to long division.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

"Please fix my marriage to prove that you are not a robot"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The chess captchas are fittingly also used on chess sites like lichess (or maybe chess.com, don't remember anymore).

[–] soulifix 2 points 1 year ago

Can we just fucking retire Captcha already? It can be defeated and there's been proof of that. If it's purpose has been defeated, then it is no longer of use.

[–] poison 2 points 1 year ago

The trick to these is to solve them as fast as possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems like a basic matrix transform. How is this a captcha?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Looks like it requires some basic OCR and pretty beefy image analysis(assuming the right side is presented as an image). Well within the bounds of modern computing, but expensive enough that you’d be hard pressed to generate thousands of spam accounts. Captchas are less about completely preventing computers from signing up and more about making it inconvenient and expensive enough that most people won’t bother.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

... making it inconvenient and expensive enough that most people won’t bother.

Sounds like life in general

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So long as you don't have to redo the whole thing after it's over, that wouldn't annoy me as much.

Especially since whenever I have to do the picture captchas where you gotta make sure there are no images of whatever, while using TOR, it'll make me do it again at least once or twice and is slow to load up said images.

load more comments
view more: next ›