146
Footage of Arizona police punching and tasering deaf Black man sparks outcry
(www.theguardian.com)
Life makes me sad.
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
146 points (98.7% liked)
THE POLICE PROBLEM
2542 readers
60 users here now
The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.
99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.
When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.
When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."
When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.
Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.
The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.
All this is a path to a police state.
In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.
Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.
That's the solution.
♦ ♦ ♦
Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.
③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.
④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.
♦ ♦ ♦
ALLIES
• r/ACAB
♦ ♦ ♦
INFO
• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions
• Cops aren't supposed to be smart
• Killings by law enforcement in Canada
• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom
• Killings by law enforcement in the United States
• Know your rights: Filming the police
• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)
• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.
• Police lie under oath, a lot
• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak
• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street
• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States
• When the police knock on your door
♦ ♦ ♦
ORGANIZATIONS
• NAACP
• National Police Accountability Project
• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The problem with society is people.
~Clerks 1994.
My girlfriend sucked 37 dicks!
I know the meme response is to say "IN A ROW???", but I've had at length discussions about this fictional woman with people, while we were stoned.
We came to the conclusion that she is a tortured soul. She has no self respect, and is trying to fill the void of a lack of a father figure in her childhood by rebelling against the concept of a monogomous relationship. Because if she admits to herself that a traditional relationship can be fufilling, and that a man can love her, then it also proves that love is real. And if love IS real, it proves that her father didn't love her. She's just not ready to face the question of "WHY NOT???!!"
Meanwhile, her boyfriend is COMPLETELY oblivious to all of this, and wonders why she's being such a bitch. So he ends up being a victim. She ends up being a victim. All because some guy 20ish years earlier was an uncaring or maybe absentee father.
And it's easy to just say he's an asshole, but he's likely got his own reasons too. Maybe financially speaking, he couldn't even support himself, let alone a family. Maybe he wasn't even told he had a daughter. Just had a one night stand, and never thought about it again. Maybe he's dead. Maybe he's in jail. Theres an unlimited number of reasons why he could be an asshole, and at the root of it all is ANOTHER person or situation making HIM a victim too.
And so, how far deep do you go? How far do you trace the roots of societies cruelty simply using a joke about a woman committing infidelity 37 times from an independant comedy movie about a group of slacker stoners that came out 30 years ago?
This is what my brain does to me. It doesn't lead me down rabbit holes. It CREATES them. This is a fictional woman, whose events never happened, and I've logically crafted an emotional backstory dating back to the 1970s, based on a joke about sucking dick in a movie so poorly funded that it's literally the official last movie released in monochrome, simply because it was cheaper. Not artistic direction.
Alright. Let's hear the backstories of the 37 individual dicks
Saw this on the Civil Rights Lawyer (iirc his name) YouTube channel Tuesday. Gross cops laughing at his impairment.
Edit: glad that his story is receiving widespread attention, at least
The description in the article sounds horrifying enough. Cops get called because a white guy is causing a disturbance, cops arrive, white guy (possibly the actual suspect?) points to the nearest black guy and they just go after him.
I am not 100%, but I think the white dude who pointed him out was the alleged suspect. The bodycam shows the coos going into the Circle K and the employee describes the problem and points to the gut, and answers in the affirmative when asked if they want the guy trespassed.
So, naturally, they told him to wait while they assaulted his victim.
That's completely fucked.
i think you might be misusing that acronym. iirc means "if i recall correctly". it seems like you meant something like "i can't recall". is that right?
"IIR his name C" didn't have the same ring to it, and I am dumb in my morning hours.
The police, "he wasn't listening to our instructions while black!? What were we supposed to do? Not punch and tazer a black man?"
I apperently clicked the wrong comments section. I thought this was the comments section for a mickey mouse comic about going fishing, and being called a boob.
Then the first comment is about the police punching and tazering a black man.
The messed up part is, I could TOTALLY imagine Mickey doing that with a smile on his face.....but I was still confused.