this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
162 points (97.1% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
390 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marcos 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nobody can convince me that's a good format.

The "battles [1][7][8][9][31][42][44][45][47][64][65][67][68][83][99]" format is superior and I'll die on that hill!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

In other words, IEEE > Harvard

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah the posted example is awful to read.

[–] goosehorse 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm working my way through House of Leaves right now, and the real horror is the grad school flashbacks from trying to follow the footnotes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jonathan Strange and Mister Norrell by Susanna Clarke is pretty fantastic/terrible about that. The footnotes are often entire short stories and span many pages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I think the footnotes enhanced my love of that book.

And I alway think kindly of Pterry's nested footnotes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could they not do the lil numbers with the footnotes instead?

[–] Khanzarate 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Holy fucking shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

They're usually end notes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

And still footnotes >>>>>>> [...] >>> endnotes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's even worse when you're quoting some motherfucker that took PRIDE in plagiarism. Did Thomas More source his claims? No. He just made them and dared your peasant ass to say something about it, meanwhile Machiavelli is out there just copy pasting Livy and planning to poison anyone that brings it up.