62% over 6 years, so like 10% a year which is still not bad, but not the same 62% lump sum like the headline suggests.
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
361 points (97.9% liked)
Work Reform
10123 readers
500 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sure, but this puts the wage cap at like $63/hour. That's ridiculously good for a blue collar job. I've been in the same field for around 16 years and I'd be ecstatic if I were making half that amount, and my job requires a lot of certifications and ongoing training hours to stay certified.
That's over $130,000/year. Plus, they hit their cap after just 6 years. I couldn't imagine making that much after just 6 years somewhere. They did a great job. Laborers everywhere should be making money like this, instead of the people sitting in chairs with lumbar support complaining that the ac is two degrees warmer than what they'd like while standing next to the corporate keureg coffee machine.
But knowing how shitty companies are they'll likely make some excuse to fire people before they get close to their 6 year maximum. It's similar to how fast food places avoid hiring someone full time by scheduling them for 35 hours a week instead of 40.
That happens at McDonald's. It never happens at strong union jobs. You fire a union worker, it has to be well documented, by the book, and for a damned good reason. There's no chance of getting fired for bullshit reasons in something like a dock workers union. You also won't be getting reduced hours.
I know unions, my dad was a union VP for over a decade. I've seen how companies can be shitty even if you have the union backing you.
My wife worked at a grocery store and as i heard their union boss golfed with the CEO of the grocery chain… as i understand it that was HR masquerading as a union, by the time she left it sure was acting the part too
Wait so any new hires after this deal was made would not be included? Wouldn't new hires also be in the union?
That would seem like a pretty big deal if true.
Just a reminder that if you're too important for you to be able to legally strike, it's all the more important that you strike anyway.
Collective action works. Tell your friends.
Good for them!