this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
79 points (92.5% liked)

RetroGaming

19555 readers
160 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Naoki Yoshida, known as Yoshi-P and the director of Final Fantasy 14, has expressed skepticism about the feasibility of remaking Final Fantasy 9 as a single title.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because it's just not possible to make fully featured games anymore? Everything's gotta be bite sized chunks for full price.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The FF7 Remake games have a lot more content than the respective parts of the original

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

And it honestly breaks the flow of the story sometimes compared to the original. Rebirth's added content felt like busywork at times to make it seem like a bigger game than it actually is.

The Honeybee sequence in Remake is peak tho, and I'll fight anyone that says otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally I've loved how much they have fleshed everything out. Like, Johnny was such a completely missable, non consequential character in the original and now he's a prominent side character. Just one example of many where they've taken a small part of the original and they have added a ton of context or fleshed out content around it.

A lot of the stuff is optional too, which I think strikes a solid balance. If you don't like the content and find it busy work, you don't have to do it. If you do like it, it's there for you to enjoy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I'm usually with you on the "skip the quests you don't like", but it really doesn't feel like an option for this series. Each of the remake games are priced at $70USD and it's not even a full story, technically speaking.

It feels really bad to not do side content, because it feels like you're not getting your "money's worth" psychologically. But the side content varies so much in quality depending on the chapter that the game just feels like a drag. It especially sucks because the OG FF7 is such a well paced story IMO, with a good balance of action/plot vs silly downtime.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

OG had three CD's, three major acts, across a pretty epic journey. Breaking it up into three parts is really not that surprising.

Personally, I love the expanded development of characters like Jessie.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't mind the expanding in Remake as much as Rebirth tbh. Remake's does expand a lot of side character's, but they feel relevant to the story. Marlene, Avalanche trio, hell Yuffie's little side story, they're all good additions. EDIT: ALSO Wall Market! Best addition by far.

Rebirth is where I think it went off the rails a bit. The game really feels unfocused with a lot of the side quests, and it really drags a bit until you get to the last quarter of the game.

Maybe it'll feel better to revisit once we have the entire trilogy. But man, paying $70/ to play Rebirth feels a bit bad when it came out at the same time as the new Yakuza and Persona remake priced at the same point.

[–] BlackAura 2 points 1 month ago

You know what's fascinating about that?

I'm pretty sure that every CD had the entire game and all the art assets for every town / place you could enter on the world map. Every enemy. All the music.

The only difference between each CD was the FMV cutscenes contained on them.

At least that was the story / rumor at the time. For optimization they could have reduced the art assets and music to only areas you could enter at that point in the game, and only enemy models you would see, but supposedly that wasn't the case.

[–] Nuke_the_whales 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Even still, I think there's like over a dozen games based on and around ff7 out there. It's a bit much. Remake the original!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aeronmelon 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Every one is mad because they’re greedily milking reruns and I’m just laughing because they clean skipped over FF8.

[–] RQG 20 points 1 month ago

They know you can't improve on a master piece.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny enough, it could benefit from a rewrite the most

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales 5 points 1 month ago

Which is my favorite one. I never liked 7, it never grabbed me. But I loved 8.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

"Volume and Complexity: Yoshi-P noted that Final Fantasy 9 is a game with significant volume, encompassing various kingdoms, environments, and story elements. This complexity makes it challenging to fit into a single remake without substantial expansion and enhancement of its world."

Because Lord knows there was never a time when we had multiple disks for a large game.

Go fuck yourself greedy fucking assholes... I'm sure they'll pull some PS5 exclusive first bullshit too so they can milk every last cent possible...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not about amount of discs. It's about dev time. If it was one whole game they'd not only bloat the budget to dangerous levels, it'd likely be outdated by the time it's finished and will either need to redo large parts of the game so it looks modern or release a game that looks like it should've released 5+ years ago.

Imagine if FFVII didn't split up it's remake, not only would we not have any of it right now. When the third part comes out it'll all just look like a PS4 game on a PS6.

If you want to argue whether or not they should go balls to wall that requires them to make a series of games so large is infeasible as a single entry, and do something a bit more budget friendly like the original, then fair enough. But then it'd just be a remaster or something not that far removed.

[–] Nuke_the_whales 3 points 1 month ago

It's funny they say that, as if we haven't played games like red dead that are much larger and more complex

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I don't think so on the PS5 exclusivity. SE said that it did not pay off in sales for XVI and I believe they said they weren't doing that again

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eh the "PS5 first" angle for FF16 and the continuation of Remake underperformed, and they admitted it themselves. I think PS5/PC releases are the future for them, so they can make more money at launch with minimal porting issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I really hope so. I've been playing ff16 finally since it's on PC and it's really good. I absolutely love how dark the story is lol it deserved better treatment/exposure on PC

[–] De_Narm 19 points 1 month ago

Because people liked the idea so much with FF7? /s

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (9 children)

They're gonna ruin it like the did 7...aren't they?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is 7 "ruined"? It's still there, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup, they left the number 7 there alright.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

They also left the original game where it was. If you don't enjoy the remake: don't play it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Speak for yourself, I've been absolutely loving the 7 remakes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm truly happy for you, to each their own... but the soulless, empty cash grabs that they turned them into, when all they had to do was port the original to modern graphics and maybe change the combat system (up for debate, not the issue here) is painfully obvious to any who look.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I would call them anything but soulless. I think the love of the game shines in every corner of the titles.

I find it odd that you admit people can have different opinions ("to each their own"), then in the same breath imply anyone who doesn't agree with you is blind/not looking ("obvious to any who look").

Whether you want to believe it or not, I grew up on original 7 and my brothers and I probably have thousands of hours between us in the game. I replayed the original on PS4 leading up to Remake, and replayed the original again on Steamdeck leading up to Rebirth. I think it's fair to say I'm a fan of the original, and the remakes both.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Omegamanthethird 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it made sense for 7. Midgar was the most interesting set piece and a ton of stuff happens there. But it's only like 10% of the game.

Then you collect side characters like infinity stones and to through a bunch of their individual stories.

Then the actual story happens.

Also, 7 is popular enough to support the split up.

This doesn't make sense for 9. Also, isn't it supposed to be a 1 for 1 remake?

[–] cybervseas 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But they want more moneyyyyy 🥺

[–] Omegamanthethird 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think it even makes sense financially. There's not really a first part for people to get excited about compared to Midgar in 7. 9 is more of a full package game.

[–] cybervseas 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mist Continent to Outer Continent for part one. They'll beef up the escape sequence in Fossil Roo as the end of the first game.

They'll add a bunch of filler and make Terra its own game.

Part three will be the endgame + the optional open world stuff before the endgame.

They'll fit a part four by carving something else up too.

It'll be a shame, too, since FF9 has a fun story and characters.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shit just make a live service with mtx if you want to fuck over wallets so badly.

[–] dvlsg 2 points 1 month ago

Isn't that how we ended up with Ever Crisis?

I would've liked a normal remaster of FF7 with that graphical style. Guessing we won't ever get it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Oh not this shit again

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Did they even finish the FF7 remake?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are two 7 Remake games out, with one more on the way afaik.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Ah, so the answer is no, no it's not done yet. Cool. /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Jumping rope about to be a whole chapter LET'S GOOOOOO /s

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Given that SE doesn't seem to want to be at all faithful with their remakes, 8 actually makes the most sense as a game they can and should make big changes to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

How dare you. FFVIII is a flawless game with a perfectly straightforward story and plot and limited grind.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have a sorceress to defeat, right after I optimally junction all of my GFs.

Chicken wuss.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To be fair, there's never been a time when Final Fantasy 9 could've been a single game. It's simply never been possible.

[–] RQG 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

If it had been, don't you think Square could simply remake it in one game rather than splitting it into the multi-game saga that it always has been? It would never work!

load more comments
view more: next ›