this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
159 points (99.4% liked)

politics

18958 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaggedrobotpubes 21 points 1 day ago

If he actually thought he won he'd jump at the chance to get the free publicity.

Well, reach out with little grabby hands and trip slightly forward, in his case.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago

Trump is a coward. He's a schoolyard bully coward. He got punched in the last debate so he's crying foul in the corner.

[–] NateNate60 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Betting market odds are 2 to 1 against Trump debating Harris again

🐔.

[–] FuglyDuck 8 points 1 day ago

But trump won the last debate with so much winning!!!

[–] Stern 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Vance gets absolutely demolished, which by all available evidence seems to be likely, Trump will clamor for another debate to try and fix things. If its middling, probably not.

[–] FuglyDuck 19 points 1 day ago

Walz gonna lead with a backhanded “thanks for coming, I know it’s hard to make time to get off the couch.”

[–] wake_up 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh man, another debate would be something, wouldn’t it? I totally get what Harris is going for here. Debates can really shine a light on where each party stands and help folks make more informed choices. Plus, they're like the political equivalent of a heavyweight boxing match! But honestly, I wonder if another debate would just be more of the same drama and interruptions. What do you think? Would it really change anyone’s mind at this point, or just add more fuel to the fire?

[–] Dkarma 5 points 1 day ago

After the last one there's nothing else trump could do to alienate voters. Eating pets was the cherry

Kamala is saying let's do it again because

  1. Trump never will

  2. It gets under his skin and drives him mad cuz deep down he knows he lost the last one to her.

Saying it is a win win. Doing the debate may not actually be if she screws it up or has a snafu.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Donald Ducks?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 1 day ago

The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Hill:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4906554-harris-baits-trump-second-debate/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support