this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
237 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18936 readers
2754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago (3 children)

California is correct. scientists have been saying for decades that most plastics are not at all recyclable, and it's very easy to follow the trail of those plastics to landfills.

[–] Boddhisatva 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yep.

After dropping off the plastic bags with trackers in bins specifically labeled for plastic bag recycling at Walmart and Target locations, ABC News and its collaborating stations monitored each tracker's location multiple times a day for months. The trackers pinged whenever they were near a compatible digital or mobile device.

The trackers were super glued and wrapped inside multiple layers of clean plastic bags. ABC News checked every location the trackers pinged from on their journey and determined that they likely did not encounter plastic bag sorting en route that could have potentially separated a tracker from a bag.

One of the first trackers to move was one deployed at a Target store in Kingston, New York, in December 2022. It showed up about a week later deep inside the Seneca Meadows Landfill in Waterloo, New York — as we deployed additional trackers over the next couple months, many other trackers also made their way to landfills.

Fast forward to May 2023, and half the trackers launched last pinged at landfills or trash incinerators; seven stopped pinging at transfer stations that do not recycle or sort plastic bags, and six last pinged at the store where they were dropped off and haven't been heard from in months, while the locations of three other trackers in the U.S. were inconclusive.

Three other trackers last pinged thousands of miles overseas – in Asia.

It's all a scam to keep people using plastics. Plastics which are now in out bodies, including our hearts , livers, testicles, placenta, and even our brains.

And this isn't just in one person, or a few people. It was found in every human placenta tested in the study linked above. Every single one. And remember this isn't only people. If this plastic debris ends up having a negative effect on reproduction, it will impact every single mammal on the planet including us.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Plastic is literally everywhere on earth. It is inescapable, it is (mostly) indestructible, and it is inevitable now. Enjoy the party while it lasts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

And yet "our" politicians chose to listen to lobbyists (bribes) rather than scientists. For decades! This is the lead problem all over again.

[–] bustAsh -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I recently bought a pair of pants. The label said they were made from recycled plastic bottles. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Also I've seen videos of people in other countries who are making various products with plastic they've cleaned up from their beaches.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

The article isn't claiming that it is impossible to recycle some certain types of plastic, the problem is that only 5% of plastics are being recycled at extremely high cost and risk.

Plastics companies are misrepresenting plastic recycling capability while writing and influencing laws that profit plastics corporations and directly poisoning the health of almost every living thing on the planet.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/12/1081129/plastic-recycling-climate-change-microplastics/#:~:text=How%20much%20plastic%20is%20actually,each%20year%E2%80%94a%20paltry%20rate.

[–] SpacetimeMachine 2 points 5 days ago

Ah so of course that must mean that these scientists are wrong!

Plastic bottles are made using PET or PETG and it is one of the few plastics that are easily recycled. Most plastics however are not. And just because people are using plastic they found to make custom products does not mean the plastic itself is recyclable. It needs to be recyclable on a large scale where it can be reused in large scale industries to not have a negative impact on the environment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They have been lying about a lot of things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The way capitalism ignored medical science to poison multiple generations with lead, and now is doing the same thing with plastics has completed soured me on capitalism. It is truly a disgusting and irredeemable system where the greed of a few outweigh the needs of everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Don't forget the way capitalism ignored medical science on the dangers of tobacco, and the dangers of sugar!

[–] aviationeast 3 points 5 days ago

Gotta release the plastic eating bacteria. Especially on the landfills. Gas companies canpay the bill for the bacteria.

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 5 days ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 6 days ago

Washington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Washington Post:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2024/09/23/california-sues-exxonmobil-plastics-recycling/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support