this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
186 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18885 readers
3695 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • One reason is Trump has a particular, well-documented hatred toward Haitians.
  • Another reason is Trump and Vance appear not to be interested in helping anyone in Springfield, or anywhere else for that matter.
  • Trump’s and Vance’s statements reveal a belief that it would be better to leave dying towns in the Midwest to wither away than revive them and have to share that prosperity with people who are Black, and they seem to be betting that enough American voters in enough swing states agree that it would be better to be broke than integrated.
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

they seem to be betting that enough American voters in enough swing states agree that it would be better to be broke than integrated.

That's sadly not a bad bet to be making. It could easily pan out for them.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I live in Wisconsin, and last year we reelected Ron Johnson (who I think may just be the dumbest person alive). Everyone has a reason it happened, but very few folks will acknowledge that part of the problem was that his opponent, Mandela Barnes, is a black man. Middle America is still incredibly racist, and for some reason we aren't comfortable just calling it out.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Not even middle America.

I grew up in Eastern Washington state, a place with a lot of farms and farmers. Due to that also a lot of immigrant labor.

I grew up in the "progressive" Pacific Northwest with lots of local businesses that had "English Only" signs, making clear to immigrants that they're not really welcome in such establishments. It hasn't really gotten better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Where and when was that? I've lived on both sides of Washington for 40 years and have never seen any "English only" signs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Please forgive my trifling quibble, but isn't that the Intermountain West (which is rarely if ever described broadly as progressive), not the Pacific Northwest -- since you were east of the Cascade range?

[–] turmacar 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Spokane here, no one outside of a survey team would call it that.

"Inland Empire" maybe, but that's about as specific as "Tri-Cities" or "the lake". PNW is the tri-state area of WA/OR/ID in casual conversation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I've lived all over the country, and that distinction means nothing to anyone outside of the Northwest. Sure, it's correct to call it that, if you're being real pedantic, but if you go down South for instance, "Pacific Northwest" means Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and they still consider that region a whole lot more liberal than it actually is.

Secondly, having also lived on the west side of the Cascades... that's less of a distinction than really matters. Like everywhere, it's actually the cities that matter, and outside the cities its as racist and backward as anywhere else.

So I feel pretty confident in calling that the Pacific Northwest in what most average Americans would think of when they considered it. Not to say most Americans suck at geology and geography (that's actually exactly what I'm saying) but I wouldn't think most would be able to point to the Cascades on a map, let alone understand the distinction between the two.

So you're correct in your quibbling, but also in the context of my response to OP, we're talking about a reluctance to call middle America what it is: racist. I would think quibbling about saying "we already knew demographically that they're not progressive" kind of misses that point.

[–] captainlezbian 12 points 18 hours ago

Well yeah, unfortunately most of the smart folks round here left so we’re filled with dumbfucks who think trump doesn’t see the rust belt as a compliment and a flyover town.

Vance is a coastal elite while folks like Senator Brown and Governor Walz ain’t. Vote union, vote democrat, bitch about how the afl-cio fucked the radical unions

[–] DarkCloud 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

JD Vance was appointed on Peter Thiel's recommendation, beating out the candidate Rupert Murdoch was suggesting.

I believe Vance worked at Thiel's Venture Capital company named Narya (a Tolkien reference, as that's Thiel's company naming preference).

But yeah, Trump was presented with two options from the right wing elite billionaires he serves. So that's how that worked.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

I believe Vance worked at Thiel’s Venture Capital company named Narya (a Tolkien reference, as that’s Thiel’s company naming preference).

Vance is Thiel's bet to remake America into a libertarian, oligarchy hell hole.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jd-vance-trump-vp-peter-thiel-billionaire/

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -1 points 21 hours ago

Atlantic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Atlantic:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/09/trumps-campaign-immigrants-springfield-ohio-haiti/679913/?gift=Je3D9AQS-C17lUTOnl2W8McwntT6mad2xm8oeF0Fb88&
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support