this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
160 points (92.1% liked)

Palestine

802 readers
227 users here now

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At the center of the debate are key changes in the language used to describe Zionism, the movement that called for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in what is now Israel.

The 2023 version of the page framed Zionism as a nationalist movement born in the 19th century that sought to secure Jewish self-determination.

In contrast, the 2024 version of the entry introduces more charged terminology, describing Zionism as an “ethno-cultural nationalist” movement that engaged in “colonization of a land outside of Europe,” with a heightened focus on the resulting conflicts with Palestinian Arabs.

“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible,” it reads.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carl_dungeon 63 points 1 month ago

I mean, if the shoe fucking fits right?

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 55 points 1 month ago

“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible”

Where is the lie?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago

About fucking time Wikipedia

[–] Daerun 40 points 1 month ago

Wikipedia is always updating its content to be more accurate.

[–] Linkerbaan 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's how Zionists themselves define Zionism, so...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Yea, but you aren't supposed to actually SAY that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did this happen in an official capacity/appears in writing? Or is this just the common understanding?

/gen

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, Herzl himself referred to Zionism as a colonial movement. In a 1902 letter to Cecil Rhodes:

You are being invited to help make history. It doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen but Jews … How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial.

The first Zionist banks were called "Jewish Colonial Trust" too. The nascent Zionist movement was always an openly colonial project. I suppose now that colonialism is not the cool thing to do anymore some Zionists are shying away from the term, but some still do openly identify their politics that way.

[–] Sakychu 14 points 1 month ago

I mean so what? The references always called it a colonization..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Some quotes from the founder af Zionism, Theodore Herzl:

Supposing, for example, we were obliged to clear a country of wild beasts, we should not set about the task in the fashion of Europeans of the fifth century. We should not take spear and lance and go out singly in pursuit of bears; we would organize a large and active hunting party, drive the animals together, and throw a melinite bomb into their midst.

If it is God’s will that we return to our historic fatherland, we should like to do so as representatives of Western civilization, and bring cleanliness, order, and the well-distilled customs of the Occident to this plague-ridden, blighted comer of the Orient.

If whole branches of Jews must be destroyed, it is worth it, as long as a Jewish state in Palestine is created.

We must expropriate gently the private property on the state assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it employment in our country. The property owners will come over to our side. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discretely and circumspectly. Let the owners of the immoveable property believe that they are cheating us, selling us things for more than they are worth. But we are not going to sell them anything back.

[–] miljadisra 7 points 1 month ago

Immigrants Pirates no shame stealing Palestinian land.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe I'll finally donate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The jewish and the palestinians have something in common. They were both driven from their home. It's a shame that coexistence wasn't the way it went but that's humans for you... everyone who isn't one of you is an other, and humans hate others.

Peace seems to always lose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

driven from their home.

Maybe the Zionists should have taken that to the EUROPEANS WHO DID THAT and forced seizure of THEIR land and made THEM compensate; not passed that shit off on palestinians and colonize them who had nothing to do with european judeophobia. equating these two is ridiculous because the Palestinians are resisting against THE VERY PEOPLE WHO TOOK THEIR LAND, rather than going to some other, poorer place, and getting funneled weapons to brutalize and colonize and genocide them. You don't see Palestinians driving tanks and bombs into Namibian villages and mass murdering them and stealing their land.

These things are not equal and it takes real liberal 'enlightened centrist' brainworms to speak in such vapid vacant platitudes as you are doing. friend your brain needs dewormed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

wikipedia more accurate on Israeli occupation than the politics of Ukrainian nazi groups like azov and right sektor who would've thought

[–] RandomGuy79 -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What does it say about Arab colonists

[–] Linkerbaan 3 points 1 month ago

Conquest is when territory is incorporated into a state or empire. That means a new system of governance for the population of a land. Examples are the Romans and Arabs.

Settler colonialism is when a non native population decides to migrate to already inhabited land by murdering and/or expelling the natives. Examples are israel and Apartheid South Africa