PowerCrazy

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

It's always been this way since super delegates were created. It was laid bare in 2016 when Hillary literally bought the DNC to ensure her coronation, there is no reason the DNC ever needs to change (after all what they do isn't illegal) and liberals will not only accept it, but fully embrace it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Meanwhile Biden's vice president was chosen based on?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

And of course as a subscriber to great man theory, there can be only one autocrat of any given country so there is no need for any other common identifier. Simply the double-plus ungood one should be sufficient for all time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

The hippies were the scapegoats, fossil fuel companies, the richest companies in the world from basically the 1880's until the 1970's, absolutely didn't want nuclear power to succeed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Pot calling the kettle black.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

New Speak isn't ever a solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean yea. They are on the same capitalist team, but the two camps are made up of the people riding coattails of their respective lord. Obama's team, vs Clinton's team. Harris was the counter-pick of the Clinton Team specifically for this situation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Number 5 has been "adopted" by most of the mainstream Dems, but in the same way abortion is important to them. Here is Biden railing against "dark money." https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4239009-exclusive-end-citizens-united-endorses-biden-in-2024/

I only bring it up because I'm pretty sure you could argue that Harris has already adopted, insufficiently, number 5. So you may want to be more concrete about what "adopting" those policies actually means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Kamala is the Clintonite Establishment candidate though. Biden is tied to the Obama camp, though I assume Biden and Clinton are more cordial then Obama and Clinton, as much as Obama even cares about those past grudges anymore.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Wouldn't it be cool if both our political parties had ambitious plans for the future?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Same. When do you think that will happen and who will it be? I'm thinking 2032, but I can't really think of any up-and-comings right now since the Dems self-immolated their bench making way for Hillary's coronation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Yes it's an Israeli line. (This was from like 20 years ago.)

 

A pretty standard pro-environmental piece, however I do appreciate how it calls out the "German Green Party," which is obviously just an astro-turfed political party funded by the coal industry.

And of course the criticism of about the farce of Carbon Capture is spot-on.

 

A growing number of Senate Democrats appear open to making it harder for migrants to seek asylum in order to secure Republican support for aiding Ukraine and Israel.

This is what the democrats stand for. Unlimited funding for the MIC and border-control, but social issues are not a priority.

Stop voting for the parties of Capital.

view more: next ›