this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
420 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6757 readers
749 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 87 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Going from making calculators to making tanks is real easy:

TI-83 -> T-83

See? Take out one letter and you just made a Russian tank variant!

[–] stupidcasey 14 points 3 months ago

Usually taking U out is the end goal of arms manufacturing.

[–] Madison420 8 points 3 months ago

Backwards. Ti made calculators from technology derived from their experience in the defense industry.

[–] Agent641 7 points 3 months ago

"Hey prof, theres a typo here in the math exam instructions for required equipment. No worries, Im sure it wont matter!"

Distant rumbling sound approaches

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I used to work for General Atomics; started as a division of General Dynamics to figure out nuclear power plants, then, after a few oil company owners, landed in private hands. They bought a small company working on drones back in the 1980s, and now the Predator and Reaper are the biggest part of the company.

[–] Agent641 12 points 3 months ago

"We can make whatever we want, because, generally, everything is made of atoms!"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Don't fear the reaper

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's right there in the name, why are you surprised?

[–] einlander 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Texas Instruments ^^of ^^destruction

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 9 points 3 months ago

This is actually backwards. Texas Instruments made so many bomb chips that they ended up with a surplus. This allowed them to throw those chips into calculators and edge out any competition with lower prices (because they already made the chips, so they weren’t paying for them.) Then once they had run off all the competition, they jacked their prices up.

And that, kids, is why the TI-84 costs $100. It’s tech that costs all of $10 to make and program.