this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
349 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He should be a lot of things, but I wouldn't hold my breath

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Wish he would….

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Based on what I've heard about the guy, I would certainly try my best to hold my breath if I ever found myself near Trump. That or use a biohazard grade face mask.

[–] Rapidcreek 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The word "shame" is not part of his personal structure

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

It’s close; “ham” is definitely part of his personal structure.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt 15 points 2 months ago

I would hope this is eye opening to firefighters around the nation and absolutely vote for Harris.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As someone who just had his home threatened for a week by a selfie (still threatened, technically) FUCK this guy.

[–] AngryCommieKender 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying that someone took a selfie, and managed to start a wildfire, or someone took a selfie and now people are threatening your property?

[–] Boddhisatva 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe talking about the King fire? But that was 2014. Maybe some other idiot did the same thing.

El Dorado County District Attorney Vern Pierson said Friday that Huntsman, a former inmate firefighter, sought to portray himself as a hero by taking a “selfie” video of himself surrounded by flames. Pierson’s office also was aided in its probe by help from witnesses.

[–] TheWormInRFKJrsBrain 2 points 2 months ago

_should be ashame _

I’m not sure he has that capability

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker 0 points 2 months ago

LA Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for LA Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-09-15/la-na-pol-trump-firefighting-aid
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support