this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
96 points (95.3% liked)

politics

18966 readers
4127 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Strictly speculation here. But, what if the motive not to return the documents for so long was because of empty folders? If any of those documents were traded for favors or money, he would need to hide the evidence of the crime that carries a death sentence. Not wanting to leave behind evidence, he took as many boxes as he could to search for them later. It's possible that he could not find all of the empty folders until the FBI did. When he claimed that mostly all he took was empty folders, it may have been an unconscious projection or gaslighting revealing his motives. The article is a bit dated, but those empty folders have been mentioned recently in discussions and news about the Mar a Lago docs case, and this article shines a little extra light on that particular detail. Oddly, there is even a claim that one of these folders was used as a lampshade of sorts, in his bedroom. Why would he have one of these in his bedroom? My guess is consternation and fear.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm just waiting for him to slip up in an interview and admit "I couldn't return all of them, because I sold some to the Saudis"....

[–] BrudderAaron 17 points 1 year ago

Nah. He'd spin it as doing a great service for the nation of Saudi Arabia and how they "Begged and pleaded" with him to sell them the documents. Of course he gladly did because he's a good guy. A great guy. Probably, no definitely best guy ever and couldn't say no.

[–] LEDZeppelin 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t make any difference in his approval ratings among R and his campaign fundraising.

If anything it will only help his chances of getting elected

[–] FuglyDuck 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trial starts in April, after the primary but before the election.

I hope it’s done before November. I also hope Jack smith starts investigating judge cannon for all these favors she’s doing trump.

[–] dragonflyteaparty 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As much as I really hope so too, I'm not sure the trial will be completed by November. Even without likely obstruction, trails can take years.

[–] FuglyDuck 1 points 1 year ago

Criminal trials can and are much shorter- especially theyrr have a start date.

Basically? It’s a trip through the evidence and a jury makes a decision. All the evidence will already be settled before hand (and smith runs a tight ship.) started in April? I don’t think trump/cannon can delay that long.

[–] grue 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why, in a world where photocopiers exist, would even Trump be stupid enough to remove the original documents and not immediately put them back?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not that he's a serial rule follower, but to copy classified docs you generally need 2 people. Copy machines in areas where classified docs are stored all operate this way.

If you take them out of their storage areas that's a different story, but of anyone sees you with a classified doc on a regular old copy machine it will be immediately clear you're breaking the rules. Also classified docs must be in their cover sheets which are bright orange/red so they are easily identified, or (again) people will know you're up to no good. Outside of secure areas they're also supposed to be in a double zipped and locked courier bag so there's that.

[–] HWK_290 0 points 1 year ago

Better than binders full of women, I guess