this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024

23 points (66.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers

2524 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Constitution Party nominee aiming to help Trump, ‘destroy’ Democratic Party (www.yahoo.com)

submitted 3 months ago by UniversalMonk to c/politics

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Boddhisatva 38 points 3 months ago

"I am not going to win the presidency. I'm not running to win. I'm running to be the margin of defeat … in the swing states. Because I'm a federal candidate, I can run television ads 60 days from the election, and the TV stations are required by law to take them, so I can target Catholic and African-American voters in Wisconsin, in Michigan, in Pennsylvania."

So, he admits that he is campaigning to elect Trump and his expenditures are actually intended to aid the Trump campaign rather than getting himself elected. That seems to me that this advertising an in kind contribution and, since it would exceed personal contribution limits, illegal under Federal Election laws.

Any lawyers around who can confirm or refute that?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"The Constitution Party's economic policy is simple: less regulation, lower taxes," he said. "Stop putting a gun to people's head to pay for your favorite giveaway. America had averaged a 1% tax on the entire populace up until 1913, with the exception of the Civil War when they were retiring war debt. When we had incredibly low taxes, low government regulations, we became the economic wonder of the world," he said.

Stupid fucking idiot. We became an economic power when most of Europe was destroyed and had to rebuild.

[–] fluxion 2 points 3 months ago

What's so fucking special about 1910s America?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In 2024, Terry won the Constitution Party nomination for president and is running to make the sanctity of human life the focal point of his campaign, with an advertising strategy explicitly designed to boost the Trump campaign and hurt the Democrats.

So… he’s planning to make the death penalty illegal and ban guns? Because sanctity of human life suggests ALL humans, not just the unborn.

[–] DevCat 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Randall Terry is a lifelong pro-life activist who founded the Operation Rescue group, which he headed until 1991. He and the group were known for their controversial tactics targeting abortion clinics, blocking entrances and staging raucous protests as Terry and associates racked up dozens of arrests and enormous sums in civil judgments along the way.

Please tie trump to this guy. The ads would write themselves.

[–] just_another_person 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This man does not appear or sound unhinged whatsoever. I'm sure this will be a rousing success.

[–] yesman 2 points 3 months ago

It's ironic that his strategy depends on what Federal law forces TV stations to do.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 3 months ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support