this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

Seattle

1590 readers
98 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Location: 3rd and Union. The Joseph Vance Building

Pay-wall link: https://archive.is/fNbTv

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kalkulat 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To see how well this works, we need to see how much each 'new' unit would cost to convert. Sometimes the cost per unit is insane ... numbers like $30 million for 100 units mean $300,000 per unit. How long is the payback for $1000 per month? 300 months = 25 years. Before deducting for maintenance and supervision.

[–] False 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unless they're very small 1000/mo would be well below market rate

[–] kalkulat 1 points 3 months ago

True, of course. But housing FOR ALL has to include housing that's affordable TO ALL. Market rate has been manipulated so that not all can afford housing. New housing has to be created so that ALL have a shot at it to solve our biggest problems, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

3rd and Union?

Yeah, just outside of the angle of this shot are more than likely a significant number of homeless people.

And this is not going to be a homeless shelter, its gonna be extremely expensive apartments, with 10% of units aimed at people earning less than $84k, meaning a rent of about $2.3k for a studio.

What a bargain!!!!

[–] SpaceNoodle 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

More housing is still more housing. Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] Scolding7300 2 points 3 months ago

People would move in vacating other apartments, so I agree this should still help

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Prices reflect supply. The more apartments there are available, the less landlords can get away with charging very high rent.