this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
179 points (95.4% liked)

politics

18951 readers
3305 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't bother trying to refute the garbage coming from Trump's campaign. That's the mistake we made in 2016 and kept making until very recently.

That just makes it seem like it's worth refutation, plus it gives the original request more oxygen.

The Democrats’ current strategy of just outright mocking Trump and his sycophants is the right one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Exactly. Treating conservatives like adults is a losing game; they lie about everything, and refuting every lie that comes out of a conservative's mouth is wasted time. More often than not, everybody who's not a conservative can tell they're lying so fact-checking gives them no extra value, and conservatives will literally never read fact checks anyhow

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

That is some IMAX level of projection. We’ve seen his team’s bad AI jobs.

[–] ryrybang 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Top sign = Trump said it. Nothing that flows from his mouth hole is reliable, accurate, or true. So you know this isn't either.

[–] ilinamorato 3 points 1 month ago

If Trump said the sky was blue I'd go out and check for myself. So I'm not going to take his claims about crowd size on faith.

[–] hperrin 22 points 1 month ago

Every accusation is a confession.

[–] paf0 15 points 1 month ago

Trump making claims that they are AI is a good indication that they're not.

[–] randon31415 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The video from the rallies is longer that 8 seconds. That is the current (animatediff) realistic video generation. Longer ones tend to go weird after 8 seconds.

[–] BreadstickNinja 13 points 1 month ago

Also animatediff has trouble making one character stay consistent over that 8 seconds, let alone ten thousand people from multiple angles in all the videos from these rallies.

[–] jordanlund 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The one AI crowd shot I saw was from a satire account. It was a joke about "enthusiasm":

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/fact-check-ai-image-crowd-arizona-harris-walz-rally-is-parody-account-2024-08-12/

https://archive.org/details/factcheck-usa-harris-crowd_202408

As a joke, it's actually pretty good:

Dr. Literaleigh A Pheline @Sarcasmcat24

"The Harris/Walz rally last night had an electricity that I’ve never seen before."

Edit Found Joe Camel! Or maybe it's Alf?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

This is part of the issue tho, right? Satire becomes reality 🙃 it seems that side of things are not interested in fact checking.

[–] ATDA 3 points 1 month ago

Fingers, mostly.