this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
120 points (91.7% liked)

Cool Guides

4729 readers
1 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QuarterSwede 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That’s a brutal representation of how we feel as gamers. Utter trash recently. What happened!?

[–] Arbiter 20 points 4 months ago

Venture capital took over AAA studios.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Is it utter trash? I wouldn't know. I haven't been able to afford gaming since the ps4 came out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

AAA consolidated. Indie became the AAs of the early 00s. Pacific Drive, Inscryption, Omori, Deep Rock Galactic, Elite Dangerous, Divinity: OS2, Boneworks 1, etc etc. There's lots of AA games and indie stuff you shouldn't sleep on.

Sure, the Dices, Biowares, Mojangs, and others have been bought up. Doesn't mean you have to play their stuff, though.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Pretty sure rockstar had nothing to do with the first GTA game. It was developed by DMA (which did later become rockstar north but at the time was not) and was published by BMG.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Lemmings was quality, it has been a while!

[–] CynicRaven 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Same with Max Payne, right? I think only Max Payne 3 was made by Rockstar.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah I believe Remedy did those first two games, but apparently whom ever made this graphic thinks you can retroactively claim releases after buying an IP.

[–] Skullgrid 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

what do you think rockstar is?

[–] CaptPretentious 4 points 4 months ago

A subpar energy drink.

The things recruiters call you when they don't want to pay you

A company that hasn't released a game in a long ass time. (Valve, The company people keep claiming doesn't release games has released several titles in the time span between 5 and whenever 6 comes out).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Just because a company / team was absorbed into a larger one and given a name doesn't mean they can retroactively claim releases under that name......

Take Two Interactive bought DMA and the GTA IP and then gave them the name Rockstar north, at no point did the name Rockstar appear on anything to do with the initial release of GTA.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good old midnight club—that game was fun as shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I gotta agree with that, there was something about that game that made me keep going back to it.

[–] USNWoodwork 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Depressing how much longer it takes games to come out now. Not that I want them rushing things.

[–] Vash63 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It's not so much the development time that bothers me here, it's the lack of diversity. They took forever making GTAV after IV, but in the meantime they had a bunch of smaller, lower budget releases. Nowadays big publishers go all in, a game is either a $200m blockbuster or it never makes it to production.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Which also means they won't take risks and most games are kinda samey.

The fun franchises of possibilities keep dying off. An indie-like attempt might get a new idea out sure, but they almost always end up bought out and closed and wallowing in forgotten IP land.

[–] Emptiness 2 points 4 months ago

The indie game scene is really fun.

If you can't be bothered to read about games just check out Splattercatgaming on YouTube. Splattercat plays a new (or upcoming) indie game every day for 30 minutes mostly from start, so what you see is what you get pretty much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Why make games at all when you can just milk the same game as a subscription service over and over?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

manhunt2 for wii...what a coup