DAE refuse to use the word "biweekly" because it has two different definitions? : doesanybodyelse

[–] Zachariah 4 points 4 months ago

I only use it when referring to bi(sexual)weekly.

[–] placatedmayhem 2 points 4 months ago

The team I was on at work number of years ago had to hash this exact thing out because we had a "biweekly" status and was confusing people. We ultimately landed on not using the term.

Bimonthly and biannually have the same problem.

[–] slazer2au 2 points 4 months ago

Yes, because I am a simpleton and Fortnightly and 'twice a week' already exists.

[–] peopleproblems 2 points 4 months ago

Get out of my head

[+] Ledivin -12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There are not two definitions. The prefix (bi) modifies the root (week). The suffix (ly) modifies the combination (biweek). Biweekly will always mean "once every two weeks" due to the order in which English dictates that the modifiers operate.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There are two definitions. The world of English disagrees with you.

[–] placatedmayhem 5 points 4 months ago

There are two definitions, according to the major dictionaries I can view (OED requires a subscription):

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/biweekly https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/biweekly https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/biweekly https://www.dictionary.com/browse/biweekly

So, the usage of biweekly as a synonym for semi-weekly is sufficiently high enough to land it in the dictionary, alongside a definition of every-two-weeks, and make biweekly an ambiguous and confusing term.

Does anybody else...?