science

15373 readers

301 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 6 months ago by m3t00 to c/science

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

time for big bang revision

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] spittingimage 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'Forbidden' black holes? What wrote this headline?

[–] m3t00 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

space.com usual clickbait. half expected them to talk about hungry black holes. not too bad of an article

[–] A_A 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

is this the starting point of a new cosmology ?
https://lemmy.world/post/17053001

(physicists) ...these luminous objects do not quite fit comfortably into those theories. ...

Those objects fit comfortably in reality but those theories (Big Bang, LCDM...) do not.

source // open access :
RUBIES: Evolved Stellar Populations with Extended Formation Histories at z ∼ 7–8 in Candidate Massive Galaxies Identified with JWST/NIRSpec https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

[–] m3t00 2 points 6 months ago

seem to need some revision. that's what I like about science. observations revise theories. no unchangable beliefs.