If this goes through you won’t see any more subsidized planes without a locked in contract, or installment plans you’ll still be on the hook for. Not a bad thing, just don’t think there’s much merit in this unless you really have to jump. The original phone company will still get their money.
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)
T-Mobile Unofficial Community
272 readers
15 users here now
Welcome
This community is for all things T-Mobile. Here you can find news, speedtests, discussions, and help with all things T-Mobile. Can't get connected, phone on the fritz, questions about plan benefits, or maybe something else? Well you have come to the right place.
Rules
- The golden rule: Treat others as you would like others to treat you.
- Do not post images unless they are absolutely necessary. They are currently not accessible to those using screen readers and Lemmy server admins are regular people with regular jobs and should not have to pay to hold your image in perpetuity.
Rules last updated 07/24/2023
Speedtests
Here you can find previous speedtest threads
Related subs:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Who is still giving out subsidized plans?
Personally, I stopped buying locked devices back in 2016 when I started using MVNOs.
Scrotus will find a bullshit way to stop this.
That wouldn't surprise me at all.
Ban orphan kernels to stop all theft of ownership. The carrier is irrelevant. The control comes directly from the binary hardware support modules for the Linux kernel on the device. If that source code was merged into the kernel, your device would work for decades. Sure, you may not want to use them forever, bit all your old hardware would still have uses elsewhere and a real second hand market instead of miscellaneous junk drawer nostalgia trinkets.
Just want to note that this effectively doesn't apply to Verizon because they already have such a rule, which was imposed over a decade ago as a condition of the 700MHz spectrum.
This means we already know such a rule works for carriers and we can apply it to the others.
Actually, the original Band 13 700 megahertz agreement was that all Verizon phones would be unlocked from day zero. And they recently got a waiver from the FCC to increase it to 60 days. So, for Verizon, this would change nothing at all. For AT&T and T Mobile, though, this would be a major difference.
Maybe now people will see how much cell phones actually cost.
They may very well decide that it's better to upgrade less because they'll actually have to pay the real price of the phone. That's a very good point.
"Device locks" limit device functionality and should go away. The only obligation should be financial, not restrictive.
The amount of resources and time wasted on micromanaging device locks is a revenue killer..... get rid of the customer pain point, eliminate this as a reason to contact, the money you save from this sure outweighs the money wasted policing this ridiculous policy. Any device sold should be compatible with any major carrier... let's make them compete for our business!!!