this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
46 points (92.6% liked)

Space

8036 readers
300 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] lunar17 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, I guess any kind of preservation is unlikely. I was hoping the ISS would be put into a graveyard orbit, so it could be kept as a monument, but there doesn't seem to be the will to do that. It's the end of an era, but hopefully that means a new chapter in space exploration is starting.

[โ€“] aodhsishaj 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There's too much debris up there to do what you propose. The ISS would just be another nucleation point for more debris. We have TBs of data from the ISS and that's where preservation efforts are being focused.

https://www.space.com/iss-astronauts-shelter-return-spacecraft-satellite-breakup

https://www.nasa.gov/faqs-the-international-space-station-transition-plan/

[โ€“] lunar17 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's not completely accurate. As the NASA link you shared explains, the normal orbit for the ISS is relatively low at 400km, where atmospheric drag and orbital debris pose a risk. The article agrees that the station could be raised into a graveyard orbit (where it could safely remain for several hundred years; this a standard way to retire space hardware), but this would require more delta V than for a controlled deorbit. In turn, this means a more expensive booster vehicle and mission.

So, the ISS could be safely preserved in high orbit, but no one is willing to pay the price to move it there. This makes me a bit sad, as it means the most expensive and impressive engineering project undertaken by humanity to date will be destroyed.

[โ€“] aodhsishaj 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The industry is moving into the space station space (pardon the pun). NASA is focused on a moon base now.

https://time.com/6163554/private-space-stations/

The ISS outlived its* initial mission role almost a decade ago.

[โ€“] elbarto777 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] aodhsishaj 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Wow being corrected by the worst student at Springfield elementary is a rare honor

[โ€“] elbarto777 2 points 3 days ago

The honor is mine.

[โ€“] NeptuneOrbit 4 points 3 days ago

Let's build a museum past the moon!

[โ€“] SatouKazuma 1 points 3 days ago

I think the future of space lies in war, unfortunately