this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2106 readers
313 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hang on. Is he showing this is proof that ancient civilizations had shrinking rays and could turn tiny dinosaurs into rocks, and build them into arches?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

The argument here is that humans lived among dinosaurs. Probably some creationist meme where Earth is just a few thousand years old.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 3 days ago

I've heard stupider. Unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Elephant with some birds on it?

[–] dojan 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think the spines are part of the background, a bush or a tree or something. Also saw an elephant. Elephant standing in front of a bush.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

I was thinking pig

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 3 days ago

Who knows? Maybe just an imaginary creature with some fins on its back that happens to look like a dinosaur. The problem is that armchair archaeologists think "this looks like that" has significance when it usually doesn't.

[–] Dkarma 13 points 3 days ago

Literally an elephant with a bush behind it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The whole thing looks like AI to me. Something seems off in the coloration.

[–] Klear 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

To me it looks like this thing:

That was added in the 90s when the cathedral was undergoing renovation.

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 3 days ago

That is entirely possible. AI pictures have been fooling these nuts lately. Sometimes they even say they're AI.

Right there in the lower left-hand corner.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

That’s clearly an early 2nd century depiction of Your Mum

[–] DaddleDew 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

^why hello there mr obelix i’m a big fan :)^

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

That's clearly a moomin

[–] MehBlah 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Of course because there is no way the craftsman who made that couldn't have used artistic license. Or for that matter never observed fossils.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

My nephew has a bunch of depictions of dinosaurs in his room.

The only logical conclusion is that dinosaurs have roamed the earth within the last 6 years.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We honestly have no way of knowing (unless this is some sort of common religious iconography, which it might be) what whoever carved it was thinking and why at this point. But I think 'dinosaur' is probably the worst answer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

You absolute fools. This is proof they had time travel!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait what does this prove?

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 3 days ago

Gullibility mostly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That'll do idiot, that'll do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Above that is a tailless kangaroo.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 3 days ago

And and below it is a Muppet mermaid.

[–] dogsnest 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Richie Cunningham never gets old.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sit on it, Potsie! It's a dinosaur if I say it's a dinosaur!

[–] dogsnest 3 points 3 days ago

You're not FlyingSquid!

Oh, wait...