this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
250 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18948 readers
4296 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 28 points 3 months ago

A very Rick Scott thing to do.

[–] disguy_ovahea 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That’s because most people listen to campaign ads more than they check voting records.

It required 3/5 majority to pass, and was voted down 48/47.

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1182/vote_118_2_00197.htm

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Rick Scott, seen here waking from his coffin,, looks like someone who only consumes the blood of babies born the "freshest way possible" because "he can taste the difference"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

It's a good thing Republicans do their own Research and are NOT in a Cult! Otherwise they might believe him at his Word!

[–] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 3 months ago

Can one defraud Medicare over IVF? Just curious.

[–] cultsuperstar 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sounds par for the course for Republicans. Vote against something and then after it's blocked, say you're for it. Or vote against something and after it passes, say you're for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Don't forget taking credit for the thing they voted against but which passed.

[–] MutilationWave 3 points 3 months ago

Let's not forget Mitch McConnell literally voted against his own bill once Democrats supported it.