"A lethal dose of one point three to two point one (or one and three tenths to two and one tenth) nanograms per kilogram in humans."
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
53 points (96.5% liked)
No Stupid Questions
36113 readers
1038 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So are they saying nanograms of the stuff per kilograms of the human?
In other words are they saying it's a ratio compared to the weight of the person?
That is correct. The ratio is nanograms of substance to kilograms of bodyweight
Thank you
Yeah, personally I would say that it's per kg bodyweight.
But I would also do my darndest to try write it, since "ng/kg" is kind of just nonsense. It makes it look like you could divide the grams out of that to get a fixed ratio, which is not correct at all.
But it is a fixed ratio.
If it was in pounds, metric tons, moles or atomic mass units... It doesn't change the ratio, the actual number.
Would it be acceptable to drop the unit all together?
"Lethal dose is 0.000000012 : 1 (substance : bodyweight)" (I made up the number).
I'm not sure if there is a better way of writing the ratio.
Could a fraction be more applicable?
"lethal dose is 1/600000 of bodyweight"
I'm sure it's written as ng/kg to show the base units are the same, and the rest is just "fiddling" scientific notation
moles
would not work, as they are no mass unit. 1 mol of Botox does not have the same weight as 1 mol of human (If that is defined at all, as organisms are no pure substances).
Ah, yes good point
Well, what I meant with that, is that it's semantically important that it's ng of the substance per kg bodyweight.
If it was ng of the substance per kg of the substance, then in proper mathematical physics, the unit would disappear completely.
So, for example:
42000000000 ng of the substance / kg of the substance
Is equivalent to:
42000000000 * 0.000000001 * kg of the substance / kg of the substance
Which means in the end, you just have: 42
As my physics teacher would often say: Is that 42 potatoes or sausages or what is it?
A number without a unit is just devoid of meaning...
Thank you
Yeah - the dose is the poison (if you drink enough water it becomes toxic), so if you are talking precisely you need to describe the concentration of a substance in which it is likely lethal to a person, and that's typically expressed as mass of a substance per mass of bodyweight. A lot of the time you will also see this expressed as an "LD50" value; the dose at which you'd expect 50% of people to die. This accounts for the fact that people's metabolisms vary quite widely.
~1ng/kg ~= 0.08ug for a typical (~80kg) person, which is a very tiny amount - whatever you are talking about is incredibly toxic.
A quick Google of the numbers says OP is likely talking about botulism so I guess they perhaps have been reading about Botox
LD50 is per kg of rat by weight
You can say "nanograms per kilogram." You could shorten it to "nanograms per kilo."
If it were mg/kg, you could say "migs per kig." You won't trick me into saying the equivalent for nanograms, though.
Edit: Not sure what you mean by how to write it as a decimal number. It's 0.0000000021g per kg. It wouldn't be standard to give just a ratio of like mass to mass because as others have written it is mass of substance vs mass of patient.
What's wrong with nags? Isn't that a term for a rundown horse or something?
2.1 ppt (parts per trillion)
That assumes that the particles are the same mass for the drug and human.
You could say a small percent mass.
Yeah it’s typically not used for dosages, rather it’s for concentrations in solution. However strictly speaking the grams cancel in the units of ng/kg and you are left with ppt. I think of ppm and ppt as very small percentages anyway. As per cent means part per one hundred. Can’t use “permille” because it means part per thousand but sounds like part per million.
In the case of a lethal dose, I think it would be fine to say, “it’s lethal at a rate of 2 trillionths of body mass”.
Seriously?
Damn!
Lots of good responses so far.
0.0000000021g/kg
or 0.0000000000021kg/kg, if you wanted the same units both sides..
( I'm presuming this was your last-line's request )
Fentanyl?
Way worse Clostridium botulinum
Most potent toxin known to science
Most potent toxin known to science
...so far.
That's true, I have been wrong on my natural gas.
Hell yeah. I know that one. Hold on, I'm gonna inject a very small portion of that into my face. Now you know I'm happy.