this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
81 points (91.8% liked)

Games

16916 readers
390 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Give me robust lore and I will want to play more.

[–] Transcendant 24 points 6 months ago

Not fucking up the f/c Fallout London mod would've also gotten me to play more (or at least, again). I played & enjoyed FO4 on PS, bought it again for Steam specifically for the new mod.

It'll sit unplayed until the mod is ready!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Characterization, world building and real dilemmas for the player will be the future of Fallout, not photorealistic graphics & live service features

[–] newthrowaway20 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Todd Howard misunderstood your request! Fallout will consist of more crafting and loot collecting and shooting, with very minimal world building beyond what's been established.

[–] criss_cross 1 points 6 months ago

And procedurally generated environments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think you are a good fit at Bethesda I'm sorry hector we are going to have to let you go. Our culture is mass market appeal, casualization, trend chasing and microtransactions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sorry :(( what I can do to buy back my soul then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ha, no, not unless Microsoft forces them to hand the IP over to a decent developer.

[–] sheogorath 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just hand over the reins to Obsidian and it'll be 10x better than what Bethesda can produce.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

i dunno, outer worlds was very mid imo

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Wonder if they regret having used that development time on Starfield instead of a new Fallout, because with this renewed interest due to the show a Fallout 5 would have done ridiculously well

[–] Renacles 23 points 6 months ago

If we get Fallout 5 before Elder Scrolls 6 I'll lose my shit.

[–] EncryptKeeper 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I’m really glad they used that low effort development time on Starfield. Maybe that games piss poor reception will shock someone into putting a little more effort into the next fallout.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Lol. Lmao.

-Todd Howard

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

If they really cared about fallout they'd give it back to black isle/obsidian for another release

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They worked on both their engine and Starfield. I just hope now the next games don't require too much engine work (since it was anyway designed around segmented maps of Oblivion and Fallout 3) and can ship games at a faster cadence.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's a solid IP it's sadly Bethesda lack the skills it demands to flourish and the mod developers have been floating them for the last 20 years

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Right, its hot right now because Amazon made a good show out of it, not because of anything Bethesda did. They almost killed the IP with Fallout 76.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean yea, props to Amazon for the good show but the story and lore of fallout has always been there. The games were just bad without mods. Honestly if Bethesda just sold books they'd probably be best sellers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Bethesda didn't create fallout though, they didn't put their hands in the series until the third game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh damn I didn't know that

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Fallout seems to be getting the Edgerunners treatment at the moment. Shame about the fallout London fiasco, that would have convinced me to spin it up again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

That's not what renaissance means. A renaissance is lots of examples of something happening during a short period. There hasn't been a fallout game for many years.

[–] Moreless 8 points 6 months ago

Just like every new metal band's album is their 'heaviest'

[–] doingthestuff 7 points 6 months ago

I never really stopped playing it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Amazing how Fallout has gotten so much attention from his so suddenly…

I wonder what changed?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Perception and attention, the newer games still pale in comparison to fallout nv and in general the trend of bethesda games becoming more soulless and less well written rpg's. But the tv shows made gamers that didn't play them play them especially 76 and fallout 4.

[–] Makhno 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fallout 4 is the highest selling Fallout game by a mile

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The most known to the public, but not the best. Fallout New Vegas and Fallout 3 are objectively better.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure you know what objectively means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I know what it mean