this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
251 points (99.2% liked)

World News

37227 readers
3641 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlopppyEngineer 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the Western version of the salami slice method. A bit more weapons. Russia blathers about retribution and consequences, maybe another salvo and that's it. Give longer range weapons and check reaction from Russia. Allow targeting Russia but limited. Now countries are slowly talking about training in Ukraine and boots on the ground and getting the classic consequences speech from Russia.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Today they have something like 7 minutes to decide whether to launch a retaliatory strike if missiles are en route if recall correctly, 12 hours seems like a luxury.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

I think the 12 hours are in reference to a conventional invasion. In case of a nuclear attack the decision might not even be made by someone high-up on account of them being encased in glass but by the crew of the nuclear subs, based on a letter the higher-ups left for that circumstance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

For reference

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] paddirn 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] brianorca 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ukraine doesn't want to target Moscow. They are not like Russia, they go after actual military targets, not civilians. They have been using their homebuilt drones for long enough inside Russia to show their priorities.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The Kremlin is in Moscow. Is it not a military target?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It has a high symbolic value but it’s not very valuable as a military target. Better to wipe out a bunch of fuel trucks and tanks and soldiers than a handful of bureaucrats in a stationary palace.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seeing it burn would send a message of much higher value

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The main benefit it would provide would be a morale boost. It wouldn’t bring Ukraine any closer to removing the Russian occupiers or slowing their attacks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Flooding the one specific bunker on the other hand... Not an easy task, but I feel that's how it would end.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Seems like a military target to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't meet the restrictions described.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

Sorry, these new US weapons take some getting used to. We'll definitely get it right next time. Promise

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


President Joe Biden has given permission to Ukraine to strike inside Russian territory with American munitions, though he has restricted their use so Kyiv can only hit targets over the border close to Kharkiv after Russia made significant advances around the city in the northeastern part of the country close to the Russian border, two US officials told CNN.

Russian forces, ammunitions depots and logistical hubs can now be targeted with US-provided artillery and rockets across the border from Kharkiv in western Russia.

The administration is also standing firm in not allowing Ukraine to use the most formidable munition it has been given to fire into Russia: the long-range missiles known as ATACMS that can hit targets 200 miles, or 300 kilometers, away.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken publicly signaled a willingness to change the administration’s tact this week when he noted that the US could “adapt and adjust” its position.

“So how do we explain to the Ukrainians that we’re going to have to protect these towns and basically everything we’re seeing around Kharkiv at the moment, if we tell them you are not allowed to hit the point from which the missiles are fired?”

Germany’s Scholz echoed Macron’s comments and said that Ukraine was allowed to defend itself as long as it respected the conditions given by the countries that supplied the weapons - including the United States - and international law.


The original article contains 569 words, the summary contains 232 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] xploit 0 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seems like their homemade ones were working pretty well at a fraction of the cost.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago

must be getting pretty good at making them if the US is starting to roll back restrictions.

or maybe that limited use is only for civilian minorities.

[–] SickofReddit -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I see this as Biden calling Putin's Bluff. And I predict Putin will double down and use a battlefield nuke in Ukraine putting the ball back in Biden's Court seeing if he'll call that bluff.

I don't think Putin is concerned with Russia past his death.