this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
73 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35837 readers
2156 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some websites are available only from US. Or some streaming service allows certain content only from US.

Why does such geo restriction exist? What is the benefit for the company to implement this?

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sock 40 points 1 year ago

legal reasons or media manipulation reasons

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Many sites have little (real/legitimate) traffic outside of their country. Traffic from most countries also generates a lot less ad revenue per user than US or other "rich country" traffic. That means the sites have a limited motivation to allow access from other countries.

At the same time, allowing traffic from other countries may force them to deal with a lot of spam/hacking/DDoS/scraping/bot and general garbage traffic, and complying with foreign privacy laws like GDPR.

This makes it easier to just block the traffic.

This is particularly infuriating when it's a government web site and you're a citizen abroad trying to access an essential government service. (In those cases it's mostly done to avoid malicious traffic.)

US news sites often do it because they get little non-US traffic and their sites are absolutely infested with ads and trackers that they can't make GDPR compliant with any reasonable amount of effort.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Very often the copyright holders of the content have different distribution arrangements for different countries/regions. If you can get the content from some other region, then your local content provider isn't getting whatever fees/and revenue they would get from you.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

On top of all the legit reasons here my former, itsy bitsy company geo blocked everything not US/Canada because our customer base was entirely US based and that wasn't changing. The only traffic we got from overseas ips was looking for vulnerabilities. So why not just block it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Countries have different laws and regulations that companies have to adhere to if they want to sell a product or publish a website there.

Additionally, they might have bought the rights to stream a movie in one country, but not others. Offering that movie in other countries would then be a copyright violation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sometimes it's because of certain laws from the EU for example that they don't want to follow like the GDPR for example. Other times it's because of licensing in case of streaming services.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is a big one. It’s a lot of work to implement GDPR and sometimes it’s easier to disallow traffic from Europe than to re-architect your back end to keep European data on European servers, allow for users to request data deletion, etc.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Bazzatron 5 points 1 year ago

I hit a lot of American sites that want to process my data in a malicious way that would be illegal.

Rather than fix the issue, the side just redicts to a "we're sorry to our European friends" - like fuck off, it's been years you cunts.

Anyway, to answer your question - it protects them from legal liability.

[–] cccc 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the website is selling physical goods it could be to prevent having to export. That can be anything from having to deal with different laws to just plain old more work with customs and everything.

[–] dan1101 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, like to ship to the new UK we are supposed to register with a UK government agency, collect the customs on each shipment, and pay it to the UK government monthly/quarterly. Or...we can just not ship to the UK which is a lot easier.

[–] benwubbleyou 4 points 1 year ago

Another reason could be for test market. For example, some products launch into smaller places as a test bed to see if they will be successful at a larger scale. Some websites and services start this way as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Traditionally, it's been about money.

More recently, with the introduction of the EU's laws on cookies, it's been about compliance. A website in the US might not wish to comply with the EU cookie laws, and elect to keep its articles geoblocked outside of the US.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 2 points 1 year ago

I imagine it probably has some IP law purposes.

[–] woshang 1 points 1 year ago

I think the reason might be related to the cost. For example, ChatGPT may not be available in Iran because in order for them to use ChatGPT, OpenAI would have to implement a server in Iran's network, which could be costly. If only 1% of the total population in Iran would pay for GPT-4, it would be impossible to make any profit.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Profit and propaganda