this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
217 points (99.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6959 readers
306 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CIA Operation Acoustic Kitty

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sramder 50 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The only one (of 15) to survive the procedure escaped the lab and was promptly hit by a car.

[–] Streetlights 12 points 8 months ago

That's what they want you to think.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The CIA has in the past said both this, and also that cat wasn't hit by a car and lived a normal life afterwards. The latter was more recent, so maybe they published misinformation earlier to make it seem like they stopped using cats, or maybe they're just trying to cover up animal crewelty?

Also I don't believe there was 15, maybe you've confused it with the 14 french space cats?

[–] sramder 3 points 8 months ago

They’re spies, so lying is like 90% of what they do ;-)

I tend to believe the whole project was an ill conceived failure and someone within CIA made up hit-by-a-car story to avoid a lengthy explanation.

Radio transmitter in a cat sounds plausible in 2011 but it would have been a much trickier proposition in 1960. Certainly not impossible but the part I always come back to is the power supply. You either need lots of batteries or a way to activate it externally without a lot of drain before you do.

Covering up animal cruelty. I wouldn’t be surprised if they incinerated the poor things just to make sure there was no chance of the research getting out :-(

I absolutely made that number up 😅 I’ve got a book at home that’s more coffee table curiosity than serious reference material that had some details of the project. I recall that there were numerous failures but couldn’t remember how many, but 14 failures plus one viable was what my brain offered… so I bet you’re right about french space cats!

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 6 points 8 months ago

Honestly that's probably the best possible outcome for it after all it went through

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

we can rebuild her

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Nvmd, a car killed it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why not make the surgery a little less invasive and incorporate the power supply, antenna and transmitter into one?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's the Cold war, technology hasn't been there yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

If you have a wire going to the transmitter/power supply, just run the antenna wire along with it. No new tech needed.

[–] HootinNHollerin 3 points 8 months ago

Did that cat just meow, or say Moscow

[–] CptEnder 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean cool if you want 18 hours of snoring and butthole licking

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

if you want 18 hours of .. butthole licking

yeah, who would want that...

[–] ThePyroPython 3 points 8 months ago