this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

Ukraine

8205 readers
783 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/2934684

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ukrainianconflict by /u/Baysdarby on 2024-05-17 09:34:27+00:00.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

The title is a bit confusing at first, but good news once you understand it!

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As it should be this far in.

There's no reason Ukraine should lose this war due to ammunition.

Maybe Russia still pulls something off, or they meat grinder their way through or something, but lack of ammunition shouldn't be why.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's no reason it should happen, but it's the most likely way that Ukraine will lose. The coalition will break down and countries will stop doing their part.

[–] Badeendje 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Several long term, at scale, contracts have been signed. Factories are scaling up, Europe is feeling the pressure. And with the absence of stocks these factories need to be producing at max capacity for a while to supply Ukraine and replenish stocks.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If they increase output and Ukraine wins, yay Ukraine wins.

If they increase output and Ukraine falls and Putin tempts fate by attacking the Baltics / Nato they're already at increased output.

Really it's a win win at this point in terms of success or readiness.

[–] Badeendje 3 points 5 months ago

Hence the investments. They make sense. NATO has known for at least 2 decades their ammo stocks where insufficient for any prolonged conflict.

Narrator:

Politicians believed this type of conflict was of the past.

They where wrong.

[–] partial_accumen 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My concern isn't manufacturing capacity, but Russian influence on politics making various world leaders withhold the output of that manufacturing capacity. This happened the USA and it took startling few Russian proponents to make it happen.

[–] Badeendje 4 points 5 months ago

I'm there with you buddy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Exactly. Russia's ultra right wing candidates are poised to win all over Europe and potentially USA. Until we get better fighting against their influence campaigns and buying off of politicians, this is the way they will win.

[–] dugmeup 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond 7 points 5 months ago

, the USA, Denmark and the Czechs! And some others!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Fire for effect boys!

[–] eran_morad 11 points 5 months ago

Fuck russia, including the republican traitor filth.

[–] Bobmighty 5 points 5 months ago

More Russian fertilizer then. Good news indeed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

The way it should be. We still need to support Ukraine more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Now let's keep increasing European production so that we don't need to go scraping stockpiles around the world while waiting for Republicans in the US to stop supporting Putin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's happening... excruciatingly slowly