this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
246 points (97.3% liked)

politics

20405 readers
4834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GrymEdm 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It feels like overturning Roe vs. Wade in 2022 was a signal flare to lawmakers about what they could legitimately expect to get away with as long as the current SCOTUS judges sit. Since then it seems every few weeks I'm reading about new laws or proposed laws that would push the nation into the past by removing personal freedoms, punishing speech, removing job protections, etc. This is another example - librarians aren't an existential threat and books should only be banned for really, really good reasons and boys holding hands isn't one.

The USA needs a way for the citizens to hold national and state Supreme Court Justices accountable or at least force a review of their decisions. Right now I'm told that the only mechanism is impeachment, which happened once in 1803.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

oh, there's a few other mechanisms

[–] GrymEdm 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't ask you to do my research for me, but do you have a starting point, like a search term, for some? I can only find articles like this one, "A Supreme Court Accountable to No One", which details the difficulties reigning in SCOTUS judges.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're hinting, satirically I'm sure, at assassination.

[–] GrymEdm 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, like I said in my other post about missing the point - I suspected but was hoping for something more legitimate since my knowledge is not nearly exhaustive. Once you start employing "alternatives" things can go downhill fast. Imagine the mess if the Jan 6th insurrection had actually been effective in some way for instance.

[–] unreasonabro 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

longest whoosh in the west!

[–] GrymEdm 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I guess. I understood what might have been said, but I was hoping it was something legitimate that I just didn't know (which is a lot given I'm a) Canadian and b) not a lawyer/governmental expert). "Other mechanisms" tend to be messy, and once they're on the table things can go to crap fast.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

It was a very sad day for the rule of law in the United States, celebrated by those who wish to undermine our institutions.

[–] uberdroog 26 points 10 months ago

The Freedumbs squad at it again. Free for me but not for thee. These states should be ghost towns.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Mack Butler (R), said the bill is necessary to “purify the schools” of “some indoctrination going on,” ABC News reported.

“[LGBTQ+ discussions and flags are] a component of Marxism where we’re – you know – destroying the family and teaching some of these things. Let it happen somewhere else other than our schools.” Butler said.

I thought being scared and calling everything you didn't like "communism" went out of style in the 1980s. Apparently not in Alabama.

[–] jeffw 10 points 10 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory

I just googled to see if that was still a thing and was shocked at how detailed the wiki article was lol

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

lol, fuck Alabama. Let the brain drain cause an implosion.

[–] Fedizen 10 points 10 months ago

Jailing people for stocking forbidden texts. What a uh... free country.

[–] jagungal 10 points 10 months ago

Ok, surely this is a violation of the first amendment. This is clearly the government restricting speech. Wait, nope. It's the government ensuring its employees don't promote speech it doesn't like. Fuck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Excuse me, but the reason I suck dick is tolerance. /s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

And the more you do the higher tolerance you get.