this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
260 points (97.8% liked)

Reddit

17716 readers
127 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If that's not the textbook image of rats leaving a sinking ship, I don't know what is. "Fuck you. Got mine!"

The price pump that conveniently happened immediately after release sure was nice for Pig Boy Huffman, wasn't it.

Data on short positions become available tomorrow (April 9th) as referenced in this article so the roller coaster is only just getting started. It's gonna get wild once the market realizes what a house of cards Reddit is built on.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this normal for tech companies? The IPO is typically the pay day event for most employees paid in stock where you can finally cash in. Doesn't matter where you think the companies going, most people would rather buy a house then stay on the tech stock roller coaster.

[–] nutt_goblin 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Usually they are barred from selling immediately following an IPO because it looks really bad and can trigger a price drop with everyone selling all at once

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answer/12/ipo-lockup-period.asp

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

They are selling a small amount and keeping the rest. I have no great love for Reddit, but it's normal and smart.

[–] OutsizedWalrus 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

$40m isn’t that much for a company with a valuation of Reddits.

Not really any conspiracy here

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (5 children)

It is when you consider that it was roughly 80% of the stock they held.

[–] artichoke 16 points 7 months ago

Is there a source for that? Don’t get me wrong, I think reddit is over valued as an unprofitable company but the 80% number smells wrong.

According to the article he sold 500k shares but according the S-1 he was granted 662,447 as a bonus for achieving above a 5B market cap (he did, it was a low target), that’s on top of the 4.6M shares he holds in mixed class A/B.

For someone paid so much in stock it’s not uncommon to want to gain some liquidity and lock in some earnings.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1713445/000162828024006294/reddits-1q423.htm

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This figure doesn't really pass the smell test, given that it's been repeated to death that the CEO makes $193 million, with the vast majority being stocks. Can you source the claim?

[–] 9point6 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Their market cap today is something like $7.5bn?

$40m would be like 0.5%

This is not news as much as we all want it to be, they definitely have much more than that, even if it's tied up in an RSU scheme or something.

[–] Copernican 6 points 7 months ago

So what do you do when you have stock in a private company while still working at it. I imagine if you are heavily compensated with equity you will take going public as an opportunity to offload and diversity.

[–] banneryear1868 1 points 7 months ago

They're just being capitalists. Having 80% of your portfolio in a single entity isn't smart.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think they're saying they did it for price manipulation, I think they're saying they ditched the shares because they thought the price would tank

[–] BottleOfAlkahest 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it true that a lot of stock dips down after an initial IPO high? Even if the company is solid? I'm not sure this isn't typical or even expected behavior for even well run companies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Generally C-level employees and officers are prohibited from selling for several months after an IPO. The restriction is common for a couple of reasons. First is it protects initial investors from added risk of the sale by the people running the company being perceived as a red flag causing a significant drop in the stock price. Second it protects the C-level employees and officers from the appearance of insider trading.

The SEC has rules in place on how high level management can trade in the stocks for their own companies to make it difficult for them to trade on non-public information. A large stock sale shortly after a significant event like an IPO can trigger an investigation. To sale the shares legally before a 90 day cool down had passed they would have needed to file a notice of the sale with the SEC and provided justification for not observing the cool down period.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

This is usually true, but since this isn't being reported as illegal trading, I'm not sure what the circumstances actually are.

But it is for sure not a good look to have c-suite shares being dumped. It gives the appearance of a lack of confidence in the share price and long-term profitability

[–] gofsckyourself 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How the fuck was there not a lock-up period? Clearly this was planned.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I agree that this is a bit odd.

[–] AtariDump 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Greedy little *pedo pig boy
/r/jailbait wasn't allowed to exist untouched for 7 years for no reason.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

I dislike reddit as much as the next scorned ex-redditor, but I can't really blame them here, regardless of what state reddit is in. if things are going downhill, obviously selling while they can makes sense. And if things are looking good, why not sell now anyway and have some actual money to spend, rather than just holding onto the Monopoly money in case it's worth more later? It's still more than enough money for them to be able to live comfortably for the rest of their lives.