this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
12 points (67.6% liked)

NBA

5004 readers
40 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was a joke vid that just goes on and on about there being a big problem but never talks about the problem.

[–] cabillaud 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right..this 11'30 video could have been 2min long easy

[–] 65gmexl3 1 points 2 months ago

while i enjoy the vid, it repeatedly uses lebron-meme clips to make fun. but i agree, creator (like others) makes vid longer for the profit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I stopped watching when it was blindingly obvious how they would let the then-dominant warriors build legitimate massive leads in the first quarter and then the refs would constantly penalize them for absolutely nothing until the 4th quarter to orchestrate a tight game before letting the warriors play again at the end. Then the warriors would be praised for being so good in the 4th.

I wasn’t a warriors fan. But the way the refs orchestrated pretty much every warriors game like it was a drama made it seem a lot more like WWE than a legitimate sport.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As someone who likes to read articles, holy @#$% was that clickbait-y and a lot of time (11 min) invested to get a couple minutes of content - no description anywhere of the 'must-watch' talking points. Okay, rant over. Mired in all the fluff were two good points: Lakers' free throw attempt (FTA) disparity over the last 2 years, and play-by-play data to show that based on the shots the Lakers take one wouldn't expect them to be top of the charts in FTAs. I dug into the FTA disparity a little more.

In the 2022 championship season, the Lakers didn't make the playoffs, and they ranked 16th in FTA difference in the regular season. Did Silver call for a change after this?

In the 2023 regular season, the Lakers averaged 5.8 more FTAs a game than their opponent (476 more FTAs total), for 1st place in the league. 2nd place was the Kings (2.1 a game, 173 overall).

In the 2023 postseason, the Lakers averaged 7.6 more FTAs a game than their opponent, for 1st place among playoff teams. 2nd place was the Knicks at 5.4.

So far in the 2024 regular season, the Lakers averaged 6.0 more FTAs a game than their opponent (471 more FTAs total), for 1st place in the league. 2nd place was the Celtics (2.9 a game, 226 overall).

Prediction: Lakers leading the league in FTAs will continue the rest of this season and in the postseason.

[–] jenny_ball 3 points 2 months ago

yes video is annoying but that stat is a great one

[–] 65gmexl3 3 points 2 months ago

it's just too obvious that numbers can't hide it anymore. but i agree, vid is longer for the profit.

[–] TAG 3 points 2 months ago

What? Sports referees are biased and are screwing my team? It is a story that started as soon as the first game with a referee was played. Refs are human and make bad calls. They will sometimes make a mistake and overcorrect or make a makeup call. Also, even with perfect refereeing, if you slice the stats enough, you will find bias in random noise.

As for the NBA, there are known biases: if a superstar and bench warmer make contact on a play, the refs will always favor the star. Bigger players are allowed to bang in the paint while smaller players are protected. Refs will only call a blatant charge and never if there is a defense foul on the play. As long as I can remember (20 years), if a player or coach whined about refereeing after the game, they would automatically get a fine but coaches would still do it so that refs favor their team's next game for fear of providing evidence to the story.

There is always a story that the league is pushing the popular team. Before the Lakers it was the Warriors who the refs favored (it was ~~infuriating~~ fun to count how many moving screens Draymond could get away with).

[–] 65gmexl3 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Is this against the subs rule that's why the post got downvoted? Can't find any rules in sidebar so i guess this was ok.

Posted here hoping to get some discussion with fellow fans if you think nba is pushing this at the max level

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Click bait title to a YouTube video might be part of the cause for down votes.

[–] Garbanzo 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Probably getting down voted by people who are angry their favorite sport is only slightly more legitimate than professional wrestling

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

There's probably not a grand conspiracy to fix NBA games, but the officiating is too fucky for me to bet against the idea.

The NBA would probably try to rig that bet too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

It reads like a weird spam ad with the YouTube video description.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing this, I'm glad I heard of it. If you want to start discussion, especially about a video that doesn't contain any details in the title, put a sentence or two in the Lemmy post description about what it is, what you want to discuss, etc. Lemmy isn't a click for ads platform; it's humans talking to humans

[–] 65gmexl3 2 points 2 months ago

i understand title is a bit click baity, but content has some good points