this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
322 points (92.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27140 readers
4046 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AClassyGentleman 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean I dunno why you'd want to preserve capitalism. It's not like the parts outside of climate change are going super well either.

(This comment brought to you by a hospital attempting to charge me $4,000 after telling me to eat a banana).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yep, I hear the pain... my son got similar advice and then the bill - 500 USD 😒 🤦. That was the lsst time I sent him to a clinic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

American healthcare is a uniquely American problem - the other 37 OECD countries are all capitalist, and that wouldn’t have happened in any of them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I've been saying that for years, but everyone said I was nuts. You can't solve anything in capitalism. If money and consumerism are your only goals, that can't solve anything. Best you can do is patch... and that's about it. There is no money in long term solutions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well you can. You just have to make the things you don't like more expensive.

The problem is that US laws are written by the rich, and the rich don't care.

...so I guess there is a capitalist government, which doesn't work. But in theory a good government and otherwise capitalist society could work. But this sort of sounds like socialism with extra steps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That is also patching a deep seeded problem - seing everything through monetary perspective. That will also stop working at some point.

I'm just saying that things like the Venus Project are the way to go if we wanna make a sustainable future. Combine that with socialisam and you can get a society that actually cares about humans, as well as everythin esle living on this earth. But, it has to be done on a global scale, while we're still divided in countries, that is not gonna work as well.

Alas, even if we don't do anything, the earth will be fine, no problem there, she's survived a lot worse than us. We are the ones thatbare fucked!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is useful to have a common motivator. If you don't like something tax it, if you do like something subsidize/pay for it. I think that is one of the big questions to answer with other systems. If we remove money as a motivator (or at least greatly reduce its value) what will replace it? There will always be greedy people, even if most people can live comfortably. What will be used to motivate them to the common good?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reeducation. Take back in moral values as real values, not something that is just admired on paper. Educate them from a very early age that if you prosper, everyone else prospers as well, if you work hard and everyone else works hard, the system works, if not, it doesn't. If you embed these values in people, they will grow, it just takes time.

The problem is, people unite and decide to change things only when faced with grave danger. By that point, it might already be too late... but, I guess we'll see what the future holds.

[–] Hotdogman 7 points 1 year ago

Hopes about to be crushed

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean it's entirely possible to live in a mostly capitalistic world and not have climate change. It just needs the right rules and regulations and taxes. Just imagine how the world would be if governments made the right decisions in the 1970s. We'd probably have no fossil fuels at all, electric cars were the norm and probably much more nuklear energy. Still capitalism but without climate change.

[–] darthelmet 11 points 1 year ago

Capitalist capture of government institutions isn’t a bug of capitalism, it’s a feature. The ability to command vast amounts of productive resources enables capitalists to exert political influence.

Whatever clever policies we could come up with are irrelevant as long as those in power are the ones who stand to gain the most by resisting change.

There isn’t a way this works out in our favor. Even in countries with capitalism + social safety nets, we see that overtime the capitalists slowly erode public gains through privatization.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That might work on paper, but not in reality.

Look, capitalism was also a great idea on paper, no doubt there... how things panned out, that's an entirely different story.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism was good, and useful, as an improvement over Feudalism.

Now, it's time to do better and move towards the next stage in our evolution. Socialism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That one’s been tried - spoiler: it’s worse.

Pick literally any former USSR state and compare the improvements in living standards before and after socialism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No Leninist and Authoritarian society ever managed to turn control of the means of production over to the workers.

Besides, with more attentive you would find that even Lenin's abortive revolution was preferable to Tsarist Russia.

Either way Makno's Black Army territories are more illustrative of Socialism than examples based in Leninist counterrevolution and tyranny.

[–] ThisIsJohnny 6 points 1 year ago

In theory yes, in reality no.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Rules and regulations are the opposite of free market capitalism. The only way to address climate change is to make society less capitalistic. The regulations required to fix climate change with capitalism would pretty much turn it into a different -ism.

And that's without considering whether billionaires will even let that happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's already been figured out that unfettered capitalism does not work. Rules and regs are required, but it also requires a government beholden to people instead of big business to actually enforce said rules and regulations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Very true. Capitalist governments are compromised, and unable to perform their stated duties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re missing how a free market is meant to work.

In a free market, ALL costs are captured and paid for at whatever rate the market determines is fair. At the moment, polluters aren’t paying for CO2 emissions - the cost of those emissions is being paid by society. In economics, that’s called an Externality, and most economists agree that the governments role is to capture externalities, because they’re a deviation from a proper free market.

To fix this, the government could enforce a rule that says all companies must be carbon neutral, and then allow businesses that are carbon-negative to trade their excess with companies who are carbon-positive. versions of this are being done in many places. The issue is the inertia of the existing systems, and the fact that you can’t just make these changes overnight.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That only matters of everyone is playing fair. It's pretty clear that the government is controlled by corporations, and it's kinda naive to think that we can just expect corporations to allow regulation to pass that hurts their profits. What we hear about free markets and externalities and regulations is just theory. Reality says that things will get much worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But then the problem isn’t capitalism, it’s corruption. Power corrupts, and Socialism places more power in fewer hands - I don’t see how that helps the environment.

I agree that corporations (especially big oil, coal, and legacy auto) are paying off politicians to slow progress on environmental issues. But abolishing those corporations and giving the power to unaccountable beuraucrats would be even worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Socialism doesn't do that, authoritarian right wing divergence in Socialism do.

Leninism was a reactionary end to socialist revolution, not an illustrative example.

Makno's Black Army territories much better illustrate how Socialism works.

Once again, Ukraine > Russia

load more comments
view more: next ›