this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
139 points (96.6% liked)

Games

33932 readers
891 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au 55 points 10 months ago

This involved a wild situation where someone was giving the pros hacks like aimbots and wallhacks as they were playing in the Finals event, effectively ruining the entire thing without anyone actually attempting to cheat.

Damn.

[–] rtxn 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Looking at Titanfall and Titanfall 2, Respawn has a pretty fuckin terrible track record with multiplayer security.

[–] sp6 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That is crazy, are there more clips or compilations? I'm just finding out about it through this post

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wonder if this is a risk for all games that run EAC.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

It's certainly alarming and I hope they make a statement for it. The idea that any EAC game could have remote code exploit means anyone playing these games could be under risk of getting hacked.

[–] big_slap 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

EAC said no via https://twitter.com/alphaINTEL/status/1769734106395373635

We are confident that there is no RCE vulnerability within EAC being exploited.

[–] Dexx1s 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Goddamn, it really did hit Forbes. Now I'm really interested in how Respawn will handle this one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is a contributor post, not a Forbes official article.

I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.

I don't know how true that is, but if you believe it then until a forbes staffer writes about it in an official capacity, it hasn't actually hit Forbes.

[–] Dexx1s 0 points 10 months ago

I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.

I understand you, but they're not the ones who matter here tbh; it's other laymen. I don't use Forbes, I just know what Forbes is. Looking at that page, I'd have no idea what you're talking about. The url is Forbes, the author's name is there, and is labelled as a senior contributor. For most of us: "we hit Forbes boys!"

[–] Visstix 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I feel like the hackers got what they wanted out of it.

[–] Dexx1s 1 points 10 months ago

They definitely did. This will easily be the top Apex news for at least a week.