this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
917 points (98.1% liked)

World News

32572 readers
798 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] False 59 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] khannie 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] BombOmOm 6 points 10 months ago

Reignited the West's arms industry as well! We had gotten complacent until Putin started the largest war in Europe since WWII.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Guys will see this and say "hell yea"

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I don't like the expansion of NATO, but due to Russia's recent imperialism, Sweden's and Finland's reactions are completely reasonable. A much healthier alternative would have been actually advancing towards an integrated European defense system involving EU members, with a door open to certain neighbours such as Norway, but it's pretty hard to do that when the political groups that could actually promote that alternative are schizophrenically tolerating positions such as "I'm a pacifist, so I'm advocating for my own country's disarmament despite my neighbours starting wars very recently" and "if Ukraine didn't want to get invaded, they shouldn't have sought guarantees against Russian aggression from third countries".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think Europeans in general psychologically still feel themselves weak without NATO, unable to fill the needs of their own defense.

I've been reading about 1st Indochina war yesterday, so - emotionally biased.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

EU's population: 448 million

EU GDP: 19 trillion dollars

Russia's population: 143 million

Russia's GDP: 1,78 trillion dollars

Simplifying a bit here (I'm obviously taking Morocco and Belarus for granted, assuming that Turkey wouldn't attack Greece, and so on), but it's pretty much a "gotta get our shit together" situation, because there's no reason why we should depend on the US for defense, or anything else.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I assume you meant trillion and not million for those gdp figures? Even then, they're low.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Fixed, good catch

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

That's about architecture more than resources. "Gotta get our shit together" doesn't negate the fact that shit isn't together yet.

It's good to have resources, but such a situation is still weakness. Only I think NATO in some sense is a contributing factor, and EU frankly too, both not in the least because of all those veto and consensus rules.

[–] harderian729 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why don't you like the expansion of NATO?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because it includes countries that are routinely looking for trouble, such as the US and Turkey. One of these days Turkey is going to try and drag us into a conflict with Syria or Iran like the US did with Afghanistan.

[–] harderian729 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's just me, but it felt like the US fought Afghanistan without much help from NATO.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] Oderus 17 points 10 months ago

Fuck the tankies in here and praise UN and Sweden.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Huzzah! Welcome to the team, Sweden. We can all be self defense buddies together! =D

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Russia locked out of the Balkan Sea now?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] zik 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Kaliningrad's fairly strategically useless to them now that every surrounding country's NATO though. The Suwałki Gap between Kaliningrad and Belarus used to be pivotal in potentially re-taking control of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. It would have been very difficult for NATO defend them if Russia took the gap. But now those countries are protected by NATO countries all around so Kaliningrad's a lot less useful strategically. Not to mention that there's a strong Kaliningrad independence movement so they're struggling to control it internally as well.

More here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›