this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
59 points (79.2% liked)

Leftism

2172 readers
28 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Solarpunk memes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why not cute for one of the other candidates?

[–] NateNate60 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Because "uncommitted" tends to mean "I'm displeased with Biden but begrudgingly admit that there is no other viable candidate that has as good a known chance of beating Trump"

[–] cmbabul 6 points 10 months ago

Which in fairness is exactly how I feel, although I think that could’ve been averted had Biden and the DNC made championing young left wing voices over the past 4 years so alternatives did exist. But that time has passed so we get this choice

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I'm just saying it's chance for you to support an alternate candidate. Of course they will not be in this year's ballot, but the party needs upcoming people to be spotlighted and the primary is a good place to do that. Just because the party leadership is flubbing this chance doesn't mean you have to go along. "Uncommitted" is better than "Biden because he's already the winner" but it still plays into the party blindness to alternatives.

[–] njm1314 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Dean Phillips or Marianne Williamson. They are the other candidates. I think choosing one of them boosts new people within the party and may give a better idea of what you're thinking than "uncommitted". Ideally, since Biden's place is secure, I wish he would acknowledge some alternate candidates, just say something he likes about them or give any indication, really, that he is aware the party needs to move forward without him in the near future. But if he won't, that's what the primary vote is for.

[–] njm1314 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Williamson has already suspended her campaign. Phillips on the other hand is even more of a neoliberal than Biden is. What kind of message would voting for him send? That you want to move further to the right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ok thanks that's helpful

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Wait, Williamson is back in the race, though.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage 2 points 10 months ago

I think uncommitted in this case is actually sending a very specific message. One that would be lost if you voted for another candidate.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Its a primary, not the general. Being told to suck it up and for this one or let Trump back in is inherently anti-democratic.

[–] FooBarrington 6 points 10 months ago

"Anything but full support for Biden must mean you're a foreign actor!"

Come on, that neither makes sense nor does it help the discourse in any way. Trump isn't a participant in the Democratic primaries, and Biden doesn't lose election votes from this. So why do you accuse people with real grievances of not being genuine citizens?