this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
74 points (96.2% liked)

politics

18830 readers
5533 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., is the latest lawmaker who has introduced an amendment that relaxes guidelines surrounding marijuana use for military members.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wr4ith 29 points 1 year ago

All of this is just addressing tangential problems created by the fact that the federal government hasn't done anything about legalizing it. Cowardly move, but not unexpected.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point.

[–] TrismegistusMx 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Military members have a higher quality of life than most people. Socialized medicine, free education, community.

It's one of the only ways they can coerce our children into becoming fascists.

[–] kennydidwhat 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calling the VA socialized medicine is correct.

It is also incorrect. Because it is a broken program.

[–] TrismegistusMx 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's better than civilian healthcare in every possible way.

[–] kennydidwhat 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The VA is a broken program. Where's the lie? When did I mention civilian healthcare?

You wouldn't have to strawman me if you had a meaningful point.

[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 1 year ago

It's not totally broken. It does a lot of good for a lot of people. This thread is about socialized medicine and civilian healthcare by comparison. Go hate elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It’s one of the only ways they can coerce our children into becoming fascists.

What makes them fascist to you out of curiosity?

[–] TrismegistusMx 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The deification of the authority of the government. Every soldier is fascist by design, or how could they justify orders to kill any other human?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

you’re thinking of authoritarian/authoritarianism— and while fascism is inherently authoritarian, the two are discrete concepts.

[–] TrismegistusMx 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're the same thing exactly. You can't differentiate them in any meaningful way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

they really are, though. authoritarianism is a sociopolitical organizational concept. fascism is a political ideology. I suggest that you do some reading on the subject.

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement,[1][2][3] characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting.[1][2] Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.[2] Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military.[3][4] States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

edit: Soviet Communism was also authoritarian, but it was far-left in its political ideology. no reasonable person would call it fascist, which is far-right.

just because all fascism is authoritarian doesn’t me all authoritarianism is fascism just like how all water is liquid but that doesn’t mean all liquid is water.

[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 1 year ago

Soviet communism was fascism. You don't have to ask me. Go to one of the mass graves and ask a resident. There's nothing leftist about any centralized government. They're all right wing. On the left are voluntary cooperative organizations. They're destroyed the instant they're detected by billionaires.

[–] Techmaster 3 points 1 year ago

I can't stand the guy but he's surprisingly been on the right side of a few issues. If only we could train him to stop being a douche.

[–] lilbirddog 12 points 1 year ago

Now do the private sector.

load more comments
view more: next ›