this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
76 points (95.2% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2036 readers
66 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Sail the high seas people, sail the high seas.

Better quality, less to zero costs and not dependent on streaming services.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well, they have to have some customers or they'll go away. I'm still with them for now, but each rate increase has always brought up questions of cost to value. I'm not against what you're suggesting, but again... these services do have to make money to stay around. My problem is now there's like a dozen different streaming services with content spread across.

In the past I've downgraded my Netflix 'service' as they have raised the rates. Not sure there's much downgrading left before I'm either forced to live with the rate or leave.

Will cross that bridge when I get to it.

[–] CobblerScholar 5 points 7 months ago

Not only are there dozens of services they constantly bicker and fight amongst themselves over what service in what country gets what media but all seemingly agree that they will raise prices seemingly on a whim. Like get your hand out of my pockets and stop making me play geopolitics to watch some damn TV

[–] echo64 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm okay with them going away. The existence of that one particular company is not a net benefit to society.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think their implication is that you want them to stay around to keep producing and offering more content, but I'm also pretty okay with that happening. Series produced by streaming services just can't seem to write self-contained seasons without leaving unresolved plot lines as a hook to keep you subscribed, but they're also just ruthless in acing anything once the numbers dip a touch. It's gotten to the point where I see "Netflix original" or whatever as a massive red flag when picking something to watch, as I know there's a high chance I'll never get any resolution to the series.

Beyond that, given the proliferation of streaming services replicating the cable packages this services initially were pitched as letting us do away with them, I say let 'em burn to the ground.

[–] CosmicCleric 1 points 7 months ago

Series produced by streaming services just can’t seem to write self-contained seasons without leaving unresolved plot lines as a hook to keep you subscribed, but they’re also just ruthless in acing anything once the numbers dip a touch. It’s gotten to the point where I see “Netflix original” or whatever as a massive red flag when picking something to watch, as I know there’s a high chance I’ll never get any resolution to the series.

The scenario you described has basically taught me to wait a season or two before I binge-watch anything on Netflix, to make sure a series never ends on a cliffhanger that won't be resolved.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Ya, I'm not rooting for them to stay around either. But the point of my comment is, if you're 'taking' their content (which in this case I mean their self produced content) instead of paying for it and everyone does that, they won't stay around. A great loss? absolutely not, but a loss none less

[–] Anticorp 2 points 7 months ago

Yo ho ho, and a bottle of rum!

[–] reddig33 29 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Streaming customer growth has plateaued. So they are increasing prices to try to increase revenue — because people are too lazy to cancel.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2024/02/27/streaming-service-growth-halved-in-2023-but-customers-still-return-after-canceling-subscriptions/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Shocking, the pandemic may have inflated the subscriber counts for them. Of course rather than see that and switch to a stable stock, they just have to have infinite growth, even though that's ridiculous post pandemic

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It was a glimpse into revenue they were desperately trying to achieve again but almost never will despite every lie about why they have to increase pricing.

[–] Anticorp 23 points 7 months ago

It's amazing how good for my mental health cancelling all of my streaming services and returning to the high seas has been! These headlines used to cause me a little bit of stress, now I just go "LOL" and move on with my day.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The year is 2032, a Netflix subscription costs $146

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

For real. What is this the 3rd or 4th price hike in a couple years? I wound up dropping from the 4k four screen plan to the $6.99 ad riddled plan because my mother in law likes to watch K dramas while she's over babysitting. Everything else is on Plex. What a rapid downfall of what used to be a great service.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What the hell are they gonna use that money for? They kill off so many shows by the second season it's hard to trust they'll provide a satisfying end to any of them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

G R O W T H

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

ferrisbuelleryou'restillhere.gif