this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
146 points (96.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5301 readers
767 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] franklin 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Given the source I'm incredulous.

While corporations are out of hand greedy and trying stifling every genuine attempts with their pseudo solutions Bloomberg is also not on our side.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

Not surprised. As a home builder who grew up using green building practices I have watched the industry take over code writing in CA much to the detriment of homeowners.

Product makers and industry leaders should not be writing building codes nor fighting the public on climate change but that’s what you get when you install incompetent pricks who paid for their campaign by catering to the industry to public office.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 10 points 9 months ago

Must. Destroy. Planet. Get. Money. Be big man.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What would be great would be not building single family homes at all

[–] RabbePompano 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No thanks. I mean I'm firmly in the build more apartments crowd but I want to own my own place with a yard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I believe the term for that is NIMBY.

[–] RabbePompano 5 points 9 months ago

I believe the term is preference. I prefer to own a home. I don't mind being neighbors with an apartment.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes! Cram everyone in apartments! People living on all sides is the dream! Who could possibly want land or space between them and neighbors!? Eliminate choice, push everyone into a box.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Um, did you forget that duplexes and town-homes exist?

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 2 points 9 months ago

Still not space or land

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

This, but unironically.