this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
129 points (98.5% liked)

News

25361 readers
4708 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China is responding sternly to a U.S. congressional delegation’s visit to Taiwan, demanding the U.S. stop any official contact with the self-governing island.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] douglasg14b 36 points 1 year ago

It's not your country, it's not your decision, buzz off with it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The white house should send back a formal response with an official seal that just reads "lol, nah"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This dates back to the 1940s, when we were supporting the KMT and the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party were fighting for control of China, before the KMT bailed out to Taiwan. I'm pretty sure that in the 80 years or so since then, the Chinese Communist Party has probably objected to the US supporting them many, many times.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

China has had many "final" warnings, there's even a Wikipedia page on how it was a common phrase in Soviet households for an empty threat

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So, they probably have a "lol, nah" form letter ready to go. That would save a lot of time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

With an uno reverse card in it 😆

[–] shalafi 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Dkarma 22 points 1 year ago

West taiwan needs to leave real Taiwan alone

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

LOL, we don't care what you want, at all.

Get fucked.

Pooh knows he needs a war to stay in power, but knows that a war with a US backed Taiwan will end his everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Considering China has never been in a major war before, their generals are all not experienced.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm kind of dubious about the whole idea of going to war to gain political points.

It can pay off, but you're hoping for a quick, inexpensive, victorious war. If it gets long and costly and not victorious, it can very much work the other way.

And a giant amphibious assault with the US Navy on the other side has considerable potential for being costly.

Argentina tried the same "let's seize some islands to score political points" with the British, and it was a considerable mistake.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War

In the period leading up to the war—and, in particular, following the transfer of power between the military dictators General Jorge Rafael Videla and General Roberto Eduardo Viola late in March 1981—Argentina had been in the midst of devastating economic stagnation and large-scale civil unrest against the National Reorganization Process, the military junta that had been governing the country since 1976.

In December 1981, there was a further change in the Argentine military regime, bringing to office a new junta headed by General Leopoldo Galtieri (acting president), Air Brigadier Basilio Lami Dozo and Admiral Jorge Anaya. Anaya was the main architect and supporter of a military solution for the long-standing claim over the islands, expecting that the United Kingdom would never respond militarily.

By opting for military action, the Galtieri government hoped to mobilise the long-standing patriotic feelings of Argentines towards the islands, diverting public attention from the chronic economic problems and the ongoing human rights violations of its Dirty War, bolstering the junta's dwindling legitimacy. The newspaper La Prensa speculated on a step-by-step plan beginning with cutting off supplies to the islands, ending in direct actions late in 1982, if the UN talks were fruitless.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aftermath_of_the_Falklands_War

The Argentine loss of the war led to ever-larger protests against the Galtieri regime and is credited with giving the final push to drive out the military junta that had overthrown Isabel Perón in 1976 and perpetrated the crimes of the Dirty War. Galtieri was forced to resign and elections were held on 30 October 1983 and a new president, Raúl Alfonsín, the Radical Civic Union (UCR) party candidate, took office on 10 December 1983, defeating Italo Luder, the candidate for the Justicialist Party (Peronist movement).

[–] Buffalox 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why the fuck can't China just leave Taiwan alone? The Communists won the entire continental part of China and everything else besides Taiwan, and they got the Communist regime they wanted uncontested. Why do they have to be such sore winners?

[–] Dkarma 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taiwan has all the most advanced chip fabrication factories on the planet. China wants them.

Also the rulers of Taiwan are basically Chinese exiles kicked out by communists iirc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If China tries to take Taiwan they'll just blow all the chip fabs, I think the CCP is more interested in getting more access to the sea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

they’ll just blow all the chip fabs,

As well as the Three Gorges Dam.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

China's Final Warning #10245. Fill it next to the other ones

[–] thesporkeffect 4 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they think Brandon can just send an email to all of Congress telling them to stop going to Taiwan and that would be the end of it. They are actively fucking with our social media, they have to know, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ok buddy 笨蛋