this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
204 points (90.8% liked)

Cool Guides

4568 readers
1 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 83 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Important to note

In the 1960s, the sugar industry funded research that downplayed the risks of sugar and highlighted the hazards of fat, according to a newly published article in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Fat still isn't good for you. It's just that sugar is bad for you also.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fat is an essential macronutrient. It's just that we consume way too much.

Just stay clear of transfat and saturated fat as much as possible, and you will be healthier.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Everything in moderation. I should've clarified what I said.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most fat is perfectly healthy, it's when it's heinously over processed or you eat too much that it's bad. Sugar also has an important place in a balanced diet, albeit much smaller.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yes. Everything in moderation. I should've clarified what I said.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Maybe a dumb question, but is there a fat industry which could have lobbied against the sugar industry?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think that'd be anyone selling high-fat products, but I don't know if they have a specific lobby. Fast food industry alone would support such effort I bet.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, there's big oil, but their lobbying agenda was pretty full already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

They were too busy taking a victory lap after pushing the idea of a "carbon footprint"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Depends on the fat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

There is active and vigorous debate about fat.

https://fatlotofgood.com.au/

Fats from natural foods appear to be unquestionably good for you.

The consensus around sugar is slowly slowly painfully slowly agreeing that sugar is not good for you.

It's going to take us a century to undo the harm of the 1960s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is never a better time to quit sugar than now. I lost 20 pounds within a few months when I did it. It is amazing the excess calories we eat without realizing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm not fat, obese or overweight, but sugar is the fucking devil. I have no addictive personality at all, and i don't even like sweets, but atarted to drink energy drinks at almost 40, and i'm absolutely hooked. I quit smoking like it's nothing. Alcohol? Nah. But i'm getting nervous when i can't get my stupid energy drink. I don't need the energy either

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Depending on the drink you've probably got a twofold addiction to sugar and also caffeine.

I don't get any kind of withdrawal symptoms from sugar, but if I don't have caffeine I start to get anxiety like that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

You are fighting millions of years of evolution, that's why sugar is so addictive even for people that otherwise don't have an addictive personality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

They have sugar free energy drinks and they are pretty good. Not that anyone needs them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Fat industry just took it like a bitch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CluckN 17 points 7 months ago

That looks like Boogie9288

[–] sploosh 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Is health at any size still a thing or did they all have heart attacks?

[–] chuckleslord 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

You understand that that campaign wasn't to promote "being fat" but was, instead, about ending the cycle of despair that traps many people in obesity, right? Like, food is addicting (on purpose, gotta make those profits) and there are people who struggle to eat the appropriate amount or get the correct nutrition. When you pile shame onto people, sure, some will change their habits and get their health back on track. But most people, when confronted with negative emotions, will attempt to soothe the feelings of negativity rather than deal with the source of the negativity. For many people, negative campaigns against obesity will just drive them to consume more. Or, maybe they'll try a fad diet out of desperation, unknowing that fad diets tend to be focused on quick results that don't have lasting impacts on overall health. Or even negative impacts, as they'll fail to stick with the diet and gain even more weight than they lost back.

Health at any size was focused on helping people to make small, meaningful changes that they could keep going with for a lifetime. By attempting to remove the stigma of weight, they were trying to get people out of focusing on their weight and instead focused on what they could do to feel better right now (in a healthy and constructive manner).

But, like most things, people who didn't understand what was being attempted shit on it endlessly until people stopped trying to do it.

The obesity epidemic isn't some moral failing of individuals it's a systemic failing and, until it's treated as such, the obesity rate will only continue to rise.

I already know this is going to be awash with downvotes (again, soothing negativity rather than dealing with the source) but it needs to be said.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

They chose their slogan really poorly. Because "healthy at every size" makes it seem like there's a healthy way to be fat.

But, like most things, people who didn't understand what was being attempted shit on it endlessly until people stopped trying to do it.

If most come off with the wrong conclusion from a campaign then that's a poorly done campaign.

[–] sploosh 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I am a formerly obese person who got out of that cycle before HAES hit. I had obese people tell me that HAES meant they are healthy if they could walk up a flight of stairs. Those are the people I am talking about, and they seemed to be people saying HAES the loudest. If there's a public perception problem surrounding HAES that's not on the public, that's on the people who let their message get diluted.

For the record, I made no comment about morality, though I do consider overconsumption to be immoral.

[–] chuckleslord 8 points 7 months ago

Fair enough, there were also people that misused the term that also made the messaging worthless as well.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

It's genuinely great to hear that that wasn't the overall goal or intention of the idea.

That said, I think it also does need to be acknowledged that there absolutely were prominent influencers on social media who preached HAES literally - as in, posting videos vehemently declaring the doctors are lying to you and obesity is actually perfectly healthy.

I guess as with many other things, it's a case of the extreme outliers (who in this case, as you say, didn't even get the point) getting the most attention and spoiling things for the sane people.

[–] Krudler 7 points 7 months ago

The thing about HAES is that it has always been a wolf in sheep's clothing

The very origins going back to the '60s come from "we aren't happy that we are fat and viewed as unattractive, so lets change what people think is attractive."

Health related concepts were thrown in to legitimize the argument and to act as a convenient red herring.

Yes there is always been a shame reduction aspect, but that shame reduction has been consistently used to enable further self destructive behavior.

It is a highly poisonous mindset that has set back public health by decades.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Man what a valuable comment, thanks for sharing it. I had never heard of health at any size but it sounds great. Sad story tho :(

[–] shalafi 1 points 7 months ago

Then the campaign slogan runs a close second for All Time Stupid, right next to "Defund the Police".

Two great ideas who managed to suicide over idiot slogans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Some young obese people have healthy markers, but sooner or later, as they age, the problems start.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

People can be metabolically healthy at any size. That's the first step. If children are metabolically healthy, and not spiking their insulin all day, then their body will self regulate and lose weight.

I.e. don't lose weight to get healthy. Get healthy to lose weight.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Feed your kids properly ffs, even if you can't do it for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Obesity and poor eating are often generational. Ignorance, poverty and misinformation can all be handed down at the same time as genetics. A lot of the parents don't know they're eating poorly. I don't think the majority are knowingly harming their own children.

Friends of my family, couple of kids similar in age. Always severely overweight. Used to comment all the time about how scrawny me and my siblings were - we were healthy weights. Years later I caught up with one of them - they were practically unrecognisable. They'd lost a ton of weight and said to me that growing up they'd always been told the family was 'big boned' but by no means did they ever consider themselves overweight, let alone obese. They saw healthy weight people outside their family and thought they were malnourished.

Your world view is shaped by your upbringing. I'm sure there's plenty of parents being neglectful or indifferent to their childrens' health but I'd say plenty more have no idea what they're doing. Add socio economic factors too, i.e. access to affordable fresh food, walkable cities etc.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not always that. I was fed properly as a kid... Just too much because I was eating my emotions. Being obese is a symptom of a problem. Treating the symptoms didn't work. It just comes right back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I'm sorry to hear that. I hope you've found your way through it OK

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The guy in the image runs Arch btw

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lies, i dont see any knee-socks.

Jokes aside i wonder if this person knew the context their picture was going to be used for or just sold the rights away to “medical journal.

load more comments
view more: next ›