Diversity and inclusion must extend to religious families
Ah yes, extending diversity and inclusion by letting people opt out of diversity and inclusion. Makes sense.
Tolerance is when you fight for homophobes' rights to be homophobic.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Diversity and inclusion must extend to religious families
Ah yes, extending diversity and inclusion by letting people opt out of diversity and inclusion. Makes sense.
Tolerance is when you fight for homophobes' rights to be homophobic.
Parents logic. The school district makes it sound like they’re not doing anything new:
In its own statement Tuesday, St. Louis Park Public Schools said it "has always complied with the state law regarding parents’ statutory right to opt out of instructional materials, and we will continue to do so."
The district said it will continue to make its curriculum available to families to review, but district staff "will not conduct reviews on behalf of any families or attempt to determine what materials may be considered objectionable."
Additionally, class discussions do not constitute instructional materials and are not subject to review or opt-outs, school officials said.
"Opt-outs based on representation of protected classes do not uphold our values of creating safe and inclusive learning and working environments in our schools," the district added. "However, because it is required within state law, any change would need to happen with the involvement of state lawmakers."
I remember my parents being told when I was going to take sex ed so they could opt me out of it if they wanted. And evolution was different- you could opt out but you still had to attend the class
I assume it’s the same thing as evolution- free to not read the offending material, but they’re going to make that kid sit there and look like an idiot for having not read the book or whatever.
Curious, the article makes it sound specific to elementary school. How does age factor into rationale for this kind of opt-out? Is the grounds for this justification not sustainable in highschool or middle school when sex Ed is taught.