this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
548 points (85.4% liked)

Memes

45661 readers
1363 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Booo! Use Calvin & Hobbes instead of this fascist shitstain.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Show me the meme generator I can use for that and I'll do it

[–] ChillPenguin 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So, I'm pretty much always out of the loop. What the hell did this guy do to get that label?

[–] Maven 24 points 9 months ago

Ooooh boy... This is Steven Crowder. Not only has he shown multiple times to hold far right views and platforming people who identify as white supremacists (most notably Stefan Malynuex and the guy who founded the proud boys) he has also been shown on camera abusing his wife.

He is anti-semitic, anti-abortion, anti-divorce (specifically so he can control his wife more), and very pro-gun and pro-white people.

Other than that he's just another great example of a failed entertainer turning to the right wing griftiverse in order to make money.

What a fucking loser...

[–] [email protected] 105 points 9 months ago (4 children)

That asshole doesn't deserve a meme, cmm.

Just use Calvin.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

Seriously! I really don't want to see this nazi fuckface any more.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Which meme generator do you suggest?

[–] Glitchington 14 points 9 months ago

Photopea - free browser Photoshop

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

I mean, we are talking free software here, so how about one posted to Lemmy the other day: https://github.com/Fredolx/meme-maker

[–] [email protected] 69 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You should donate to free software you like because you like it.
____________________________________

Change my mind.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

But I don't want to change your mind

[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago (3 children)

We should stop using memes of a hateful and abusive douche

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just curious, who is this guy, sounds like you knew about the original picture? I've been curious

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

steven crowder, a far-right talking head who moves in the same circles as Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, etc. if rush limbaugh was vader then crowder is kylo ren.

[–] captain_oni 16 points 9 months ago

Do you mean: failed comedian, and wife abuser Steven Crowder? That Steven Crowder?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is a great description, okay fuck that guy. Thank you

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He also abused his wife a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godnroc 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why?

And I do mean that honestly, it's not like he's empowered by people making memes of him. He receives no benefit, there is no gain. If I used Hitler in a meme because he made a funny face, that isn't an endorsement of his actions or beliefs, sometimes a meme is just a meme.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

I know you weren't asking me, but to chime in, it's safer to say that the circumstances of memeing are actually way more complex than we give credit. I'd argue that it's rarely the case that a meme is just a meme. Situations where an event or a person becomes a meme can be totally misinterpreted, reinterpreted or otherwise change from reality. Memes are used tools, many times as propaganda, and who is in a meme possibly, does have an effect. Memeing is actually a big complex part of the human experience! Especially since proliferation of the internet.

Anyway, it's interesting to think about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 9 months ago (3 children)

there is plenty open source software, that you can buy. There are many modes:

  • you buy the support (redhead)
  • you buy the long-term-support (ubuntu)
  • you pay for backports to old releases (keycloak iirc)
  • there is a open source version, and you can pay for enterprise features and hosting (gitlab)
  • there is an open source version, and you pay for customization (star office, iirc)

and my personal favorit:

  • you pay a random developer to submit pullrequests for bugs that are relevant to you
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 12 points 9 months ago

I just woke up and never heard of redhead and immediately thought, "Damn is that why I struck out with that girl?"

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

This is all true, but it's interesting how people often forget another simple option: the software is commercial - it is simply sold on some website/store. Just like you can buy the game Mindustry on Steam, but it is Libre Software and even though you can get the build for free on GitHub and its itch.io page, people still pay for the Steam version. I wonder why people forget about this option, since it's probably the simplest one.

Of course, Steam is a proprietary, unethical platform, so I'm just using it as an example - I'm not saying we should sell there.

[–] CheesyFox 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tbf, of all unfair platforms, steam is one of the fairest. Humane at least.

[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Is it? On GOG you can download games without installing their proprietary client (there is also a libre alternative called Heroic Games Launcher, but that's made by the community). Itch has a libre client and it's also optional. Both those platforms don't put DRM in games, unlike Steam.

Steam has forced updates. This means that game developers can push an update that for example deletes content from your game and as far as I know, you can't really refuse it.

On a page of every game that is sold on Steam, you will see text that says "Buy". But I'm pretty sure their ToS says that you are only renting games from them. So they are misleading their users.

[–] CheesyFox 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

That's why I said "one of the fairest" and not "the fairest one". There's a whole lot of what steam does and other companies won't ever do, for instance, Proton. I am forever thankful for it especially, since it motivated me to give linux the second chance. Not to say, that this particular technology turned the whole OS table around.

Steam is not perfect by any means, but people behind it offering quite a fair deal both for the devs and especially for customers. There's basically no alternatives, bc steam has so much more to it than just storing your game library and being a game vendor.

On a page of every game that is sold on Steam, you will see text that says "Buy". But I'm pretty sure their ToS says that you are only renting games from them. So they are misleading their users.

Not actually owning games sucks, but find me a digital marketplace that doesn't say that you're only "renting" them or some other bullshit. Steam doesn't call it renting, rather, I quote, "As a Subscriber you may obtain access to certain services, software and content available to Subscribers or purchase certain Hardware", where the subscriber is the word to call any user that has a steam account, nothing less nothing more: "You become a subscriber of Steam ("Subscriber") by completing the registration of a Steam user account." https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/#1

Basically, this wording is a backdoor for them, in case their servers will be shut down and they won't be physically able to provide any game files. Yes, it opens some ways to exploit this, but unlike some other companies like Ubisoft, Valve never seem to use it this way. Also, torrents do exist, and guess what, they're DRM free, just as you like it, I assume. That's actually exactly why they should exist, imo: to preserve things.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bonus_crab 45 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Id pay taxes to support open source projects.

[–] aeharding 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Those in the EU do with NLNet! (Although arguably not nearly enough)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah def not enough. It's funny how governments and companies are willing to pay overpriced proprietary software that even comes with no or horrible support, but when they use OSS they hardly contribute and sometimes even get great support via github. But sometimes that's also the other way around. You pay for expensive license and get shitty support even if it's OSS. Looking at you Teleport

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago

Downvote cause calvin should have been used instead

[–] Phegan 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Fuck Steven Crowder. He does not deserve this meme format.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They don't always make it easy though. I'm not signing up for Patreon just to donate a one time amount.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What ways do you recommend?

I like Patreon because I trust it and it provides a subscription-like service. And having a way to communicate and engage is really nice.

But the "buy me a coffee" and the direct PayPal, I'm rarely getting any kudos.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You can try librepay

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Confusing free as in freedom with gratis there

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They said "free" and I elected to interpret that in the way that allowed me to make a little joke

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

No joking allowed here. Straight to jail.

[–] ignotum 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

WinRaR is not in prison, so it's free

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

WinRar is proprietary

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I am interested in paying donations to free and open source software I regularly use and have into my workflow. I will completely ignore your project if you make me deal with license keys. The Grayjay method is ok but would prefer that code and buttons not be dedicated to getting in my way. I hope that the mentality of paying for what you use becomes more common in FOSS culture so that prompts aren't needed.

That said if your broke, don't dontate. Take advantage of it being free and when you get a good job again, then consider helping out the developers.

In recent personal experience, I recently changed the motherboard on my Winblows VR gaming PC and It wouldn't recognize my legit product key anymore. I don't have patience for DRM shit so I activated it with KMS. Activation keys are a pain in the arse.

I emphasized It's use for VR gaming just in case someone tries to sell me on the Linux Proton compatibility system. Someday soon steamVR will hopefully have good compatibility and I will give it a go. However I will always at minimum be stuck with windows on a secondary ssd as I have some Oculus games I also like and Oculus+revive will likely never work under Linux.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I should add that I am broke myself so it's a bit high and mighty of me to say people should donate when I have not done so yet.

I have started by at least supporting game developers on Steam. Mostly indie to medium size studio ones. Again, I can't stand the AAA game DRM key crap.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (8 children)

The cost of switching to an unfamiliar Interface and workflow is high enough, charging money to do it will further increase the barrier to entry.

Paying for open source software sounds good on paper, but if it is required, the software will never accumulate the users to make the development have any meaning.

There has to be a "try it before you buy it" too. Otherwise the permutations of scams are obvious and nobody will fall for that. Idk how you would prove that the software works, without giving an actual copy of the software.

Also, legalities between different countries. You will just not get your money back from "trustworthy nigerian software dev who just needs 50$ to give you some software".

So no.

Do donate if you can though. If you value the software you use, you will pretty obviously recognize the utility and the cost to you, should it go away.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Freesoftwareenjoyer 11 points 9 months ago

It would be nice if I could quit making proprietary software for a living. Maybe some day I will try making some commercial libre software and will see how it goes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Yes but I'm broke lol

load more comments
view more: next ›