this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
21 points (81.8% liked)

politics

19928 readers
3737 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Candelestine 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's funny, I think it reflects the ease of making money with celebrity gossip, which takes very little investment to produce and tends to draw a fair amount of engagement.

Whatever we click on, mixed with what is cheapest to produce, that's what we get more of.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

All that data-driven marketing really bringing the "insights" these days.

[–] Rapidcreek 3 points 1 year ago

Mindless zombies who believe that Martians are hiding everywhere. LOL. I really blame the National Enquirer who Trump must have read religiously and actually believed the insane stories they ran.

[–] youngGoku 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Candelestine 1 points 1 year ago

And corporations, who are driven to only make profit, with the easiest way to accomplish that being to take advantage of people's natural weaknesses. Like a drug dealer would.

[–] FlyingSquid 26 points 1 year ago

It's weird... the article is paywalled and yet it isn't just a single line that says, "Republicans have oatmeal for brains."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Powerful woman smeared in a coordinated manner by a movement bent on subjugating women.

It's so hard to figure out what's going on here.

[–] Rapidcreek 8 points 1 year ago

"Conspiracists have often worried about artists being manipulated for political ends. After Anna Akhmatova, a Russian poet, gave a recital in Moscow, Stalin is said to have raged: ‘Who organized the standing ovation?’ In the 1950s America’s paranoid ‘Red Scare’ blighted careers and lives, including Charlie Chaplin’s.”

“As during the cold war, American politics is now especially conducive to suspicion of entertainers. One of them became president, a reality-TV star whose rallies combine the vitriol of a witch-burning with the reassuring formula of a game show. Donald Trump blurred to vanishing the line between politics and showbiz; he also dragged conspiracy theories to the centre of debate. And he exacerbated a prior political trend—America’s extreme polarisation—which encourages conspiratorial thinking.”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

https://archive.is/2024.02.06-150642/https://www.economist.com/culture/2024/02/06/the-meaning-of-the-hysteria-over-taylor-swift

Honestly, my first reaction upon understanding their relationship was "well yeah it would be nice to date someone famous and get a huge windfall for doing it".

The theorists really have a canny way of finding the most mundane piece of skepticism and turning it into something unbelievable.