this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
25 points (74.5% liked)

Benjamin, Get The Musket

146 readers
1 users here now

Chronicling a body of evidence demonstrating that the U.S. government is horrifyingly tyrannical at almost every level, and authoritarianism, cronyism and corruption have poisoned almost every aspect of American life. We show the very real need for Americans to follow through on the Founding Fathers' instructions to overthrow their government and the evil corporations that control it.

If you find a news article or dumb corporate bigot on Twitter that has said or done something so egregious that it made you wonder why Americans don't band together and do something about those motherfuckers, it belongs here.

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/11612572

I bought 175 g pack of salami which had 162 g of salami as well.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The weight is never exact, buy a few packages and see if the are within a standard deviation of the listed weight.

[–] penguin_knight 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

confused by this.

to calculate a standard deviation OP would have to buy a few packets anyways.

if you maybe wanna buy 100 to find what the standard deviation is, by definition, only 68% of them will be within a standard deviation (assuming the weights are normally distributed)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Usually foods are regulated that the standard deviation falls within some range of grams. Sorry if I was unclear.

[–] hOrni 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sine when is pasta not 500g?

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Shrinkflation, theft, consumer fraud

They're literally skimming money out of people by doing that.

[–] 0xb0b 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

In the US they are usually sold in pounds, so 450g/ea or so.

[–] Mpatch 3 points 10 months ago

You gota report that to the consumer goods or something like. They can get fined very big deneros for selling under weight goods. Like it's a realy big deal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Is 410g the gross weight perhaps?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

no, product weight

if it is liquid it should have gross and net. packaging never counts as product weight...yet

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

no, product weight

How do you know?

[–] Dabundis 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At least in the US, federal regulation requires the net weight printed on the packaging

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How do you know the packaging was printed for the US market?

[–] Dabundis 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's actually more likely that it wasn't printed for the US market (pasta in the US is most commonly sold in packages of 1 pound/453g), but that brand of pasta does sell to a US market which subjects them to US regulations. It seems weird to me that they would go through the effort of cheating on packaging only in some markets.

It's a lot more likely that the pictured disparity is caused by a combination of (1) the 410g figure being a nominal value with an accepted error margin, and (2) home kitchen scales not being the most precise instruments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It’s actually more likely that it wasn’t printed for the US market

The English-French bilingual packaging suggests this particular box was sold in Canada (although the brand isn't familiar to me). I'm sure we have some similar law, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Because

The FPLA relates to the net quantity of contents information on packages, goods, or commodities that are sold on the basis of weight or measure (i.e., it does not apply to such products as electronic or industrial equipment that have contents sold by the quantity of their contents and appliances

https://www.nist.gov/standardsgov/compliance-faqs-packaging-and-labeling-us#2

Not trying to be snarkey but it literally was a 2 second search. There are laws against this, and it used to be standard practice to put a small amount more than actual weight (volume) listed bit now it seems they stopped giving a shit and dare you to question or sue them into compliance.