this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
401 points (98.3% liked)

Hobby Drama

2262 readers
2 users here now

A community for the drama, big and small, in hobby groups.

RULES

  1. BE KIND. No bigotry, flaming, trolling, etc. Do not brigade (remember we are outside observers)!
  2. NO DOXXING. Do not post addresses, real names, etc of individuals. Exceptions are made for public figures (eg celebrities) and companies, but keep it relevant.
  3. 14 DAY RULE. When making a post drama should be concluded for at least 14 days to make sure it's fully concluded and give a complete scope to posts. The exception to this is the weekly Hobby Round Up megathread which this rule does not apply to.
  4. INCLUDE CONSEQUENCES. When posting include what the drama means for the community. "The state of the game is worse off and players are leaving" is better than "and everyone was mad the end".
  5. KEEP OUT BIAS. If you are one of the main participants in the drama don't post, this isn't a community for validation seeking. If you're a peripheral (eg you're in the hobby and have an opinion, but aren't the one the drama is about, leading a petition drive, etc) posting is fine. Strive to be objective in your write-up.
  6. NSFW. If a hobby or drama is NSFW mark the post as such.
  7. REPOSTS. Reposts should be clearly marked with [REPOST] in the title and a link to the original post at the top or bottom of the post. Posts that don't follow this rule will be warned and then removed if the requested changes aren't made.
  8. TITLE GUIDELINES. Titles should include the following tags as appropriate:

An example title would be: [Video Games][Old School Runescape] The hat scandal OR [Repost][History][Music] Fyre Festival controversies

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Watch collectors are kind of an odd bunch. I'm talking about "dumb" watches specifically - watches that only tell time and don't have any sort of smartphone connectivity or biometric tracking. Some of the fancier models might have a timer on them, but you're certainly not going to be getting text notifications. Watches have evolved over time from being a tool to basically men's jewelry. A few key terms to know first:

  • Mechanical - a watch that keeps time and is powered by a complicated series of springs and gears (this is called the movement). Due to the relatively high amount of niche skilled labor involved in making them, even the most basic mechanical watches can be fairly expensive.

  • Quartz - a watch that keeps time via a quartz crystal oscillator and is powered by a battery. They are much less expensive AND more accurate than mechanical watches, but are frequently looked down upon by watch collectors as not being "real" watches (they don't have a mechanical soul or some dumb shit like that).

  • The Swatch Group - the Swiss watchmaking industry was seriously threatened in the 70s and 80s by the "Quartz Crisis", when significantly cheaper quartz (mostly Japanese) watches began to completely dominate the market. Several Swiss companies survived by merging together to form the Swatch Group. Mechanical watch brands moved even more upscale, with a greater focus on luxury, artisanal craftsmanship, and brand heritage. They also launched a new brand, Swatch, which made inexpensive, but still Swiss-made, quartz watches in an attempt to the re-capture the entry level market share they had lost.

  • Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional - the "Speedy" is one of the most popular watches made by Omega, a luxury brand owned by the Swatch Group. It's notable for being the watch that was given to all Apollo mission astronauts and was heavily used in the early NASA days, so the majority of its branding is based around the fact that the Speedy has been to the moon.

In early 2022, the Swatch Group announced a new watch model that was going to be a collaboration between two of its brands - the Omega X Swatch Bioceramic MoonSwatch. The MoonSwatch would have the same appearance and dimensions as the Speedy, with a few key differences:

  • The Omega X Swatch branding.

  • A quartz movement instead of a mechanical one. The Speedy is known for having an especially complex movement since it's a chronograph (i.e. an analog stopwatch).

  • The casing would be made of "bioceramic" (basically plastic) instead of stainless steel.

  • Price would be $260, compared to the $6000+ of the Speedy.

Immediate reactions were heated. While some people loved the idea, a loud contingent hated it. The main complaints:

  • It was quartz and thus not a real watch.

  • It was made of plastic and thus not a real watch.

  • The MoonSwatch devalued the real Speedy, since it was effectively an officially sanctioned counterfeit made of cheaper materials.

  • The watch devalued the entire Omega brand, since they were putting their logo on a watch that even the poors could afford (the least expensive Omega is around $2500, which is actually on the low end for luxury watches).

The MoonSwatch came out shortly afterwards, and it turns out that demand far exceeded supply. The watch was only available in select Swatch boutiques (for example, only 11 stores in the USA carry it), so if you didn't live near one of those stores you were SOL. People were lined up for hours to buy one. The MoonSwatch also came in 11 different colorways (themed after the planets, the sun, and the moon), and some of the models were limited to certain stores or even countries. A lot of the watches immediately ended up on Ebay with huge markups. Since it was sold out everywhere, that ended up pissing up the people who actually liked the watch. Some of the things they were upset about:

  • It was easier to buy the real Speedmaster than the MoonSwatch. Speedy sales actually increased by 50% immediately after the launch.

  • The distribution model meant you had to live in a major metropolitan area or be okay with buying one from a scalper online.

  • The different colorways not being available everywhere upset the completionists who wanted to have one in every color.

  • Accusations of favoritism where a few Swatch stores were taking bribes to let people have access to them early (favoritism is an issue with the watch industry in general).

Anyway, it's been a year since the launch of the MoonSwatch. Hype has died down a bit, but they're still hard to buy (Swatch stores will sell out in an hour whenever they get new stock). Swatch has said they aren't planning on doing online sales, but it's not intended to be a limited edition watch. There's still criticism (I've seen complaints that the plastic feels cheap), but even the detractors had to admit it was the hottest watch of 2022.

TL;DR - Watch brand releases a watch that's kind of a copy of a way more expensive watch made by the same parent company. This angers half of the watch collecting community. The other half is angered because the watch is sold out everywhere and a pain in the ass to buy.

Credit where credit is due; This is a repost from reddt

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dystop 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've never liked communities based around buying certain products. So much gatekeeping and drama... and for what, to spend money? It's a marketer's wet dream.

I don't see any value in celebrating the fact that someone went out and spent money to get something, or stood in line to get something.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The community is based around the objects... For enthusiasts, watches are neat. It's an interesting thing because they are functional jewelry, and you can't actually own that many cause they are expensive, and you can use even fewer at a time cause you only have two wrists (and even watch people will make fun of you if you wear two watches at once).

So the real community is talking about new things, what's coming up, what you like and dislike, surprising history, a lot of stuff. In my group, we absolutely celebrate when someone gets a new watch, but not cause they've passed some kind of gate, but because they now have something they can enjoy and build memories with.

The truth is, marketers will take advantage of any hobby

[–] Foggyfroggy 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, watches are frequently a guy hobby. It’s better than it used to be but men don’t have as many jewelry choices or ways to accessorize their style especially when dressed up or for work.

[–] almar_quigley 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most dudes could get over the thought that jewelry is for women or “gay” and just bling up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's never easy to just "get over" decades and decades of societal conditioning. This isn't some moral dilemma that we need to get over asap....this is fashion choices lol.

[–] almar_quigley 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s fair. I’m not making it a moral dilemma but I think millennials and younger are much better equipped to question societal norms and try to go their own route in cases like this that have no impact on others.

[–] 3rdBlueWizard 1 points 1 year ago

If we're going to ignore societal norms, can we please bring back 80's hair? I fucking love 80's hair.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

My experience has been the complete opposite over on the watch subreddit. I never saw any gatekeeping and if you posted a picture of your new $10 watch there absolutely were plenty of comments on how awesome it is and how happy everyone is for you to get something you like. Also a lot of talk about the history and inner workings of watches not just circlejerking over brand names. Overall a pretty positive and encouraging group in my experience.

[–] nadram 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Consumerism at it's finest. We get so worked up for things that should never get much emotions out of us. Watches, cars, console wars, fashion brands, mobile OS 🤮🤮🤮 We should make the effort not to care so much about brands, and just buy less. No one needs a watch

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one needs a watch

Not buying a watch is not going to solve consumerism. As someone who owns a (non luxury) watch I think that they’re really useful, and that more people should give them a chance

[–] nadram 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My comment was mostly about brand loyalty and the madness that ensues. As for the usefulness of watches, i realized they were redundant when i broke mine over 10 years ago and never bought another one again. We can all tell time from a phone, a computer, a train, car, microwave etc... Spend a week without one and see. Fine if you prefer to have one, but it isn't a necessity or even a tool anymore, more of a fashion accessory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I prefer not having to take out my phone just to check the time and because of that I consider a watch a necessary tool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, these people don't see watches the same way you do, and that is ok.

I only own a couple of watches, not really a collector, but I do like watches. I love em from the sheer fact that they are purely mechanical items. I like looking at the craftsmanship, and ofc how they look.

Like car people (who aren't brand shills), love the cars themselves. What they represent, what they can do, what noises they make. How it feels while driving. Of course if you're not interested in any of that you won't be seeing eye to eye.

Plus, who am I to say what should make other people happy when it isn't harming anyone? Someone liking a watch doesn't do anything for the people around em.

[–] Dinodicchellathicc 2 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the history of watches.

[–] dystop 4 points 1 year ago

Well a train conductor probably needs one, but I get your point haha

[–] bfr0 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bro idk shit about watches and this is at the top of /all for me and you just transported me into this world so I could experience the drama.

10/10 upvoted on multiple accounts

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh man have you found your community, assuming this settles into a continuation of the original subreddit. Obscure interests lavishly produce "inject this directly into my veins" drama.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So this was super interesting and I went to check out the watches… why why why why why is every watch a variation of the color of the associated planet and goddamn Venus is pink?! Because clearly they needed a lady watch and us ladies always want pink? Grrrrr pointlessly gendered. Sorry I got carried away, anyway nice writeup.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I can see it. But it would make more sense if it's yellow like the planet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they had to choose yellow for the Sun, so it couldn't be that color.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You're right. Checkmate

[–] filter 20 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t say that I’m a watch collector. But a watch enthusiast? Definitely. I love watches of all types even though I have my own personal taste.

So what was it about the whole Omega x Swatch debacle that upset me? The fact they were basically gatekeeping a plastic watch that was a homage to the moon watch.

I stand by the fact that the price of a watch doesn’t really matter in terms of true value. Which is why budget timepieces have a high place on the list of many watch enthusiasts (see Timex or Casio).

This watch should have joined that list. It should have been a catalyst to introduce more people into the hobby of collecting or simply admiring these wrist worn works of art (occasionally lol). Instead, it’s another case of fomo and splintering of a community of people who already find ridiculous reasons to gatekeep each other (the write up points to this fact very clearly).

Anyways. My two cents.

[–] bricks 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good write up.

You know… I don’t agree with it, but I totally get it. For people outside of the community, many people have INTENSE relationships with their watches. I think they tie part of their identity with certain milestones, and when a watch is also so tightly bound to said milestone - certain jobs, certain incomes, certain life events - any perceived cheapening is seen as a direct assault to their identify.

It’s like… your dad handed down his Speedy when you got married. You bought your first Speedy when you made partner at your law firm. Whatever it is, now there’s this perceived slight that some 15 year old now owns a bastardised version of something you achieved and they didn’t.

All of it’s made up. It’s jewellery. I’m sure the Hayeks are sitting in Biel/Bienne laughing their asses off. But still… my dream watch is the VC 222, and when they did the rerelease, I was kinda like - wtf, guys. Even though I have zero affiliation with the original 222 and will never own one, I tricked myself into an emotional attachment with it.

[–] Izzent 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is so stupid. Tribalism at its best, elitism at its worst.

[–] bricks 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yes, but also… ¯_(ツ)_/¯

I see shit like this in EVERY community. Cars. Dogs. Guitars. Coffee. PC Parts. Booze. If there’s any thing where the core components of the hobby have variable pricing and scarcity of the “best” stuff, the most dedicated to that hobby will find a way to invent hierarchy. Humanity is beautiful and gross.

[–] 3rdBlueWizard 2 points 1 year ago

Whoa, that shrug guy loses his backslash arm in Lemmy too? It's a reddit flashback!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t have much to say about watches but THANK YOU for bringing hobby drama to the fediverse!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Seconding this sentiment. HobbyDrama is one of the very few communities I missed from Reddit. I couldn’t start it myself because I’m not well versed in hobbies and they’re dramas myself, so I couldn’t have contributed. I’m so happy to have these to read again, and I’m ok with them being cross-posted from Reddit to get the ball rolling.

[–] BendyLemmy 14 points 1 year ago

The whole premise is a miss for me. The idea that $260 is cheap (because Omega's cost $2500) is, frankly, stupid.

A watch should primarily display the time (in a permanently visible face) and possibly add the option for some audible reminders.

Changing batteries is a big problem, and so Solar (or Kinetic IDK) is an essential concept.

Casio with bold analog face, I can see the time without my glasses, and without even directly looking at the watch face (peripheral vision when riding my bike).

It has a digital inset with options for hourly chime, automatic day/date, and enough accuracy so I only adjust it once every 6 months or more...

It cost 1500 THB (maybe $25) and never needs a battery change...

7 years later it is always there for me to see the time.

So it is much more reliable than any smartwatch, and more functional then the majority of watches on sale.

[–] Etterra 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

TIL there are people that take the collecting of expensive, single-purpose watches more seriously than any hardcore gamer takes their favorite game. Now I want to see somebody to bombard their community with ads for the cheapest shit-tier kids' wristwatches and Chinese knockoff brands available.

[–] RGB3x3 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go to reddit.com/r/watchescirclejerk for the people who realize how ridiculous it is to take collecting jewelry so seriously. They're watch enthusiasts who realize how stupid it is to be a serious watch enthusiast.

It's hilarious. Because watch culture is filled with some of the most pretentious and self-aggrandizing people you'll ever meet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish I didn't have to go to reddit to look at this (using Teddit btw) - maybe we need a Lemmy version of that sub

I'm definitely a part of that flock.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I own basically the cheapest mechanical chronograph watch in existence and I love it. For 250 bucks you can get a "Seagull 1963" watch from China on Amazon.

It's actually a really nice looking watch with a glass case back so you can see all the gears in the movement. It was designed by the Swiss company Venus a long time ago and they sold it to a Chinese company at some point where it got copied by a bunch of other Chinese companies.

You might find it under a different brand name. Mine is the "Seakoss" variant. They come in a bunch of different styles and sizes so pick whichever you prefer.

Sure maybe it's not great to be supporting China but so much stuff we buy comes from China anyway so I don't think about it too much.

I wanted a mechanical watch so I could admire the gears but I wasn't about to drop many thousands of dollars on one so this thing fits the bill.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misterundercoat 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Me, who likes buying dirt cheap vintage watches:

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All I got from this is that I searched the watch and now I want one...

[–] CodingCarpenter 2 points 1 year ago

Bro welcome to the club that's how it all starts. Pretty soon you've got two cases full of watches and you never stop eyeing that countertop in Zales or whatever jewelry store

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You didn't mention about how they said all the MoonSwatch models would be available for purchase online and then later pulled that back and none of them are available online.

Also, many of those who were pissed about the MoonSwatch ripping off Omega were also pissed about not being able to buy one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I missed these. Thanks for reposting, it was a fun read. Odd that Swatch Group still doesn't sell the MoonSwatch online, given it's supposed to be the affordable version ($260 USD) of the Speedy. Maybe they like the hype, but you'd think they prefer money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised that Omega would allow such a massive devaluing of their brand. That's about the only thing that keeps the value of these watches, the perception that a brand is worth so much. When everyone can have it for 5% of the price, it seems as though it would be harder to sell the real thing. People who want the status of such a high end brand would likely look towards other brands which hadn't devalued their brands so much.

[–] Dirty_Penis 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't seem to have had that effect. Omega's selling more Moonwatches than ever at the highest prices ever. Nobody's buying a $200 plastic quartz watch instead of a $6,000 automatic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I never understood the watch thing. Mechanical watches are a Rube Goldberg way of timekeeping in the age of electronics. I was always hell on watches, so kept to cheap Timex or Casio watches. After I started carrying a mobile phone, I stopped wearing them entirely.

I do get cars and motorcycles though, at least to a point. Even something as simple as accelerating onto the highway is a vastly different experience in a Mitsubishi Mirage compared to doing the same in a V6 Camry, Z06 Corvette, or Tesla Model S.

After a certain point though, you're well into rapidly diminishing returns in terms of performance /dollar, and it just becomes another financial dick swinging contest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting read, not really into collecting watches but I appreciate beautiful timepieces - and this drama around the MoonSwatch actually piqued my interest in acquiring this watch. I'm liking some of the colorways they're offering. I dabble more with smartwatch watchfaces, but this looks special.

Also understand the drama as people do get too involved in some of their hobbies. I just hope all this has died down and will allow me to look for a Mercury Mission MoonSwatch that's not scalper-priced.

[–] Speculater 3 points 1 year ago

Why can't users make new posts or cuss in this community??

[–] Skanky 3 points 1 year ago

As someone who grew up in the '80s, when I heard Swatch I immediately thought of those inexpensive wrist watches that had wildly colorful designs and interchangeable wristbands. They were hugely popular and if you didn't have 40 bucks to spend on one, you were not with the "in" crowd, mainly dominated by yuppies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I might have gotten one, if you could have just easily ordered one online. Even though it's overpriced for what it is. Because I like the speedy, but I'm not spending thousands on a watch, personally.

So instead, I didn't feel bad at all about getting a $20 fake one from DHGate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't realize watches got so expensive. Not that I've ever really shopped for one.

[–] Jumpinship 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not a dumbwatch guy, but i was aware of the plastic omega Nd wanted one because the colors etc. The real speedmaster doesn't draw me in as much. I don't want to wear something expensive thst i have to baby around. My current smartwatch was 600 bucks. Not cheap, but not exactly devastating if scratch it up

[–] ext23 2 points 1 year ago

Knew this would be about the MoonSwatch lol.

I love watches but have a hard limit at about $200-300. I live in Japan and you can get extraordinarily good quality mechanical (i.e. "real") watches that are made domestically for that price or even less from great brands like Seiko and Orient.

Anything beyond that is IMO just pretentious and tacky in the sense that you're kind of just flaunting your wealth.

My point is that yeah watch fandom kind of really sucks, I unsubbed from r/Watches and never looked back.

load more comments
view more: next ›